Styrjöld til að stjórna auðlindunum og framleiðslu. Peningar eru bókfærsla, kvittun. Stríðið til að eiga tölur skrifaðar í seðlabankanum. Þú verður að nota mína krónu, minn dollar, mína peninga bókfærslu, þá á ég allt sem þú gerir.jg

 

By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest.

Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity. " -- Abraham Lincoln

 

ALL WARS ARE BANKERS' WARS!

Greinin á þessari slóð er mjög fróðleg

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/allwarsarebankerwars.php#axzz4Y778iAfM

Click here for PDF version of this article

By Michael Rivero

 

(The war is about to control the recources, and every creation. Styrjöldin er um það að stjórna auðlindunum og allri framleiðslu. 

Money is notting but Accounting, note, receipt. Peningar eru ekkert nema bókfærsla, nóta kvittun. 

The war is about to be the one who owns the numbers we write in the central bank. Stríðið er um það að eiga tölurnar sem eru skrifaðar í seðlabankanum.

You must use my króna, my dollar, my money my Accounting

. Þú verður að nota mína krónu, minn dollar, mína peninga bókfærslu.

If you use my money, then I own everything you do. Ef þú notar mína peninga, þá á ég allt sem þú gerir.jg)

"The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this world would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you wish to remain slaves of the Bankers and pay for the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." -- Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England in the 1920s, the second richest man in Britain

Read more: www.whatreallyhappened.com http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/allwarsarebankerwars.php#ixzz4Y7ylno5U

000

Can a bank foreclose on your house if they have provided nothing of real value in the mortgage?

A little remembered footnote in banking history occurred in December 1968. A bank was moving to foreclose on a house, and the homeowner decided to fight the foreclosure in court, arguing that contract law requires two contracting parties to agree to swap two items of value, legally called the "consideration." In the case of First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Jerome Daly, Daly argued that since the bank simply wrote a number in a ledger to create the loaned money out of think air, there was no real value and therefore no legally binding consideration. The lawyers for the bank admitted that this is how the bank works. They create money out of thin air as a ledger or computer entry, which you must repay with your labor. And there was no law in 1968 that specifically gave banks the legal right to do that. Daly argued that because there was no equal consideration, the mortgage was null and void and the attempt to foreclose invalid. The jury agreed! So did Judge Mahoney, who resisted demands to over-rule the jury in favor of the bank, and wrote a simple streightforward decision that stated that there was no question that the mortgage contract was void because the claim that the bank simply made up the money out of thin air was not disputed by the bank itself.

Judge Mahoney was murdered with poison less than six months later, and the lawyer representing Daly was debarred. The decision in favor of Daly was then nullified on procedural grounds and the entire matter forgotten! Read more: www.whatreallyhappened.com http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/allwarsarebankerwars.php#ixzz4Y7D1sw96

When the Confederacy seceded from the United States, the bankers once again saw the opportunity for a rich harvest of debt, and offered to fund Lincoln's efforts to bring the south back into the union, but at 30% interest.

Lincoln remarked that he would not free the black man by enslaving the white man to the bankers and using his authority as President, issued a new government currency, the greenback.

This was a direct threat to the wealth and power of the central bankers, who quickly responded.

"If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become endurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to North America.

That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

-- The London Times responding to Lincoln's decision to issue government Greenbacks to finance the Civil War, rather than agree to private banker's loans at 30% interest.

In 1872 New York bankers sent a letter to every bank in the United States, urging them to fund newspapers that opposed government-issued money (Lincoln's greenbacks).

"Dear Sir: It is advisable to do all in your power to sustain such prominent daily and weekly newspapers... as will oppose the issuing of greenback paper money, and that you also withhold patronage or favors from all applicants who are not willing to oppose the Government issue of money. Let the Government issue the coin and the banks issue the paper money of the country... [T]o restore to circulation the Government issue of money, will be to provide the people with money, and will therefore seriously affect your individual profit as bankers and lenders." -- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler

"It will not do to allow the greenback, as it is called, to circulate as money any length of time, as we cannot control that." -- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler

"Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power, and chattel slavery destroyed. This, I and my European friends are in favor of, for slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care for the laborer, while the European plan, led on by England, is for capital to control labor by controlling the wages. THIS CAN BE DONE BY CONTROLLING THE MONEY." -- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler

Read more: www.whatreallyhappened.com http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/allwarsarebankerwars.php#ixzz4Y8Mf8rEg

Read more: www.whatreallyhappened.com http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/allwarsarebankerwars.php#ixzz4Y8MJVjwR

Ég hef birt þetta að einhverju leiti áður. 

Egilsstaðir, 08.02.2017 Jónas Gunnlaugsson