But unethical researchers, or those with a political agenda, find ways to subtly manipulate the "adjustments" to temperatures. Of course, this report will not be accepted by global warming hysterics. report will generate discussion and debate -

New Research Calls Global Warming Data - Not a Valid Representation of Reality!

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/07/16/new-research-calls-global-warming-data-not-a-valid-representation-of-reality/

A new report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data generated by NASA and the NOAA found that it's complete bunk.

The paper was peer-reviewed by some notable scientists with some pretty impressive credentials who agree with the report's conclusions. - 

000

In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified.  It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU. -

000

The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming. -

000

But unethical researchers, or those with a political agenda, find ways to subtly manipulate the "adjustments" to temperatures. What the authors of the paper found is that NASA and the NOAA managed to leave out cyclical temperature patterns, thus making it appear the average temperature was constantly rising.

Of course, this report will not be accepted by global warming hysterics. They will probably accuse the authors of being in the pay of Big Oil. But wherever the truth still matters, the report will generate discussion and debate — exactly what good science is supposed to do.

Egilsstaðit, 29.06.2018  Jónas Gunnlaugsson

 

Athugasemdir

[Valdimar Samúelsson, 29.6.2018 kl. 11:43]

Sæll Jónas þetta er áhugaverð grein og vonandi mun skinsemin vinna þessa global warming hysteríu.

[Jónas Gunnlaugsson, 4.7.2018 kl. 10:08]

Ég vil trúa því, að skinsemin nái yfirhöndinni. 

Hún síast út til fólksins, eins og Guðs, Gyðinga, Sjáenda trúin dreyfðist neðanjarðar í Rómarríkinu, þótt stjórnsýslan berðist gegn því.

Allt bendir til að súrdegið sýri brauðið.

Þakka þér innlitið.

Gangi þér allt í haginn.

Egilsstaðir, 04,07.2018  Jónas Gunnlaugsson

[Valdimar Samúelsson, 4.7.2018 kl. 11:19]

Þakka Jónas.