Jónas Gunnlaugsson

26.10.2016 | 17:46

The Government ... has shamefully abdicated its traditional responsibility to create a supply of money, publicly, and debt-free, for the people.

Otherwise, we will continue with the situation today where the private banking system is acting as the national money supply mechanism and levels of debt will continue to go through the roof, along with bank profits, and our taxes!

http://www.ismennt.is/not/jonasg/jg/jg06/deptfreemoney/deptfreemoney.html

000

Prosperity: Freedom from Debt Slavery, is a four page monthly journal on Money Reform.
To subcribe follow this link

Our Money Reform brings Democracy and Freedom from Debt Slavery

The following speech was delivered by Alistair McConnachie at the American Monetary Institute's 2005 Monetary Reform Conference, at the Essex Inn, 800 South Michigan Avenue, Chicago, on Thursday 29th September 2005, at 6pm. It was published in the September 2005 issue of Prosperity.

Thank you. I have been asked to speak about the Bank of England, and its place within the monetary system of the UK. After that, I want to tell you about the monetary reform which we in the United Kingdom are proposing.

Tomorrow we are going to be hearing about the US Federal Reserve, from Mr William Hixson -- author of the two wonderful books, Triumph of the Bankers and A Matter of Interest, and one of the founders of COMER, the Canadian-based Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform, from whom we will also be hearing this evening.

Now, the Federal Reserve is differently constituted from the Bank of England, but given the political will, both institutions are able to be reformed to deliver the results which we as Money Reformers are seeking.

"Given the political will" -- creating that political will, is the real challenge for us.

THE BANK OF ENGLAND
The Bank of England is Britain's Central Bank. Just as individuals and businesses keep accounts at commercial banks, so commercial banks and government keep accounts at the Central Bank -- in our case, the Bank of England.

The Bank of England began in 1694 when King William needed money to fight a war against France. A company promoter by the name of William Paterson came up with the idea of a bank. It would raise £1.2 million and then lend a million to the Crown, at a high rate of interest. In return for the loan, it was incorporated by Royal Charter as the "Bank of England" which became the government's banker. Thus began the British national debt.

It wasn't until 1946 -- 252 years after it was first established -- that the Bank was nationalised and brought more firmly under the control of the British government. In practice this didn't change very much although it meant that the State acquired all the shares, and that Governors and Directors were to be chosen by the Sovereign on the advice of the Prime Minister. Further, the Chancellor of the Exchequer reserved powers to give the Bank formal directions.

Richard Greaves has written a very good article, which I commend to you, in the January 2005 issue of Prosperity, "Shedding some Light on the Bank of England". Copies are at the back of the hall, and I'm using his research when I tell you that:

Today, operating as it does as the bankers' bank, it is to the commercial banks (ie the High Street banks) what the commercial banks are to the public.

Just as we may deposit money with commercial banks, so commercial banks in turn keep deposits with the Bank of England. The amount of cash that a commercial bank can buy up from the Bank of England to meet its customers' cash withdrawals is limited to the amount of deposits it has in its account at the Bank of England and/or what it can borrow from the Bank of England or from other banks. Commercial banks borrow from the Bank of England in exactly the same way that individuals and businesses borrow from commercial banks…

However, it is much more significant to note that whilst the Bank of England is now state-owned the fact is that our money supply is once again almost entirely in private hands, with 97% of it being in the form of interest bearing loans of one sort or another, created by private commercial banks.

Indeed this is now where the real power resides -- with commercial banking.

The Bank of England is now essentially a regulatory body that supports and oversees the existing system. It is sometimes referred to as "the lender of last resort" in so far as one of its functions as the bankers' bank is to support any bank or financial institution that gets into difficulties and suffers a run on its liquid assets. In these circumstances, it is not obliged to disclose details of any such measures, the reason being so as to avoid a crisis in confidence -- confidence being something on which the current system is very dependant.

However beyond that, it is no longer a major player in the lending/money creation market. Its annual accounts reveal that its loans and profits are only a fraction of those of a major commercial bank such as Barclays, and it only holds a very small amount of government stocks, so it is no longer really lending to government either -- that function has largely passed to the merchant banks.

Most of its profits come from what is known as the "issue department" -- the department of the bank which is responsible for printing and distributing bank notes and coins. These are purchased by the high street banks to meet their customers' demands for cash and the various banks have their accounts at the Bank of England debited accordingly. Basically, the profits from this operation belong to the state and are transferred to the Treasury, thus being added to the public purse.

THE PROFITS FROM THE NOTE ISSUE GO TO THE PUBLIC PURSE
The Bank of England Annual Report 2005 states that for the year 2004/2005, "the profits of the note issue were £1,618 million (2003/2004 £1,234 million). The change was the net effect of more notes in circulation on average during the year and higher interest rates. These profits are all payable to HM Treasury." (p.34)
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/annualreport/2005report.pdf

So we see here that the Bank of England is quite open about the fact that the profit from its note issue -- that is, the difference between what it earns by selling the notes at face value to the commercial banks, minus its cost of printing, minting and distributing them -- goes to the Treasury.

That is, the profit goes right into the public purse as an effective debt-free input -- this benefit is traditionally termed "seigniorage".

Now imagine if everyone was using notes and coins instead of electronic forms of money. The debt-free benefit to the public purse would be immense! It would be in the billions and billions of pounds, and taxes would fall massively.

Indeed, in 1948, around half of all money in circulation (46%) was notes and coins which were created debt-free by the government, with the profits going directly to the public purse.

However, as the demand for electronic, cheque book and credit card money has risen, the demand for notes and coins has fallen.

This means that most money circulating in society is now private bank debt-based money in electronic and cheque book form -- around 97% of money circulating.

As a result, the private banks are making vast profits from this situation. And because the government has an ever-declining source of seigniorage revenue, our taxes go up to repay the money which the government has to borrow from this private banking system!

*****

At the same time, more and more people are swallowed up in ever-rising levels of private debt.

Over the years, the Government has simply ignored what has been happening to the money supply. It has ignored the fall in the demand for notes and coins and its subsequent loss of seigniorage.

In other words, it has shamefully abdicated its traditional responsibility to create a supply of money, publicly, and debt-free, for the people.

*****

As Money Reformers, we are saying that in addition to regulating the banking system, it is the responsibility of government to maintain a basic stock of money in circulation which is free from debt at its point of creation.

If society enjoyed the benefit of a 46% debt-free money stock in 1948, then there is no reason why we shouldn't continue to enjoy such a benefit today -- although this doesn't necessarily have to be in the form of notes and coins. It can be in the form of electronic money, created debt-free for public purposes.

*****

Otherwise, we will continue with the situation today where the private banking system is acting as the national money supply mechanism and levels of debt will continue to go through the roof, along with bank profits, and our taxes!

*****

FOCUSING OUR MESSAGE
So what do we propose to do about all this?

If we want to take an idea into the mainstream, we need to concentrate on one of the core issues, and we need to come up with a practical policy to apply it, which is politically workable … in the circumstances of the moment.

Focusing in this way is a core strategy of the American Monetary Institute.

If we don't have focus, then the message won't take off and fly. So, while I am not going to speak about the specific reforms suggested by the American Monetary Institute, I want to tell you about what we in the UK are proposing.

THE POLICY WHICH WE PROMOTE IS …
what we call The Prosperity Proposal: Publicly-created Debt-free Money. Slogan: "Money for the People, and by the People: The Democratic Imperative".

SO, WHAT IS PUBLICLY-CREATED DEBT-FREE MONEY?
It is money created by the government of the day, debt-free.

That is, debt-free! Not "interest-free". Not "low-interest". But debt-free -- money which does not have to be paid back.

Money Reformers say the government has the power, indeed the duty and the responsibility, to create money debt-free, instead of running to the private banking system for it.

We have seen that it already does this via the note issue.

It needs to extend that principle to other forms of money, such as electronic-based money.

We call this money, "publicly-created money" since it is created on behalf of the people of the nation by their elected government. It belongs to the people of the nation, and it works for the benefit of the people of the nation.

It is not intended to benefit the banking system or any private interests -- as so much government borrowing does today.

INSTITUTE A PUBLIC MONEY DEPARTMENT AT THE B of E
Practically speaking, our innovation proposes an extension to the Bank of England -- which we could call the Public Money Department -- which would be chartered to create debt-free money for the exclusive purpose of financing investment in Public Fixed Assets -- that is, in things like maintaining the schools and hospitals.

This "publicly-created money" would be a debt-free input of money to the Treasury, just like the production and sale of the notes and coins represents a debt-free input to the Treasury -- of, as we have seen, somewhere around £1.6 billion last year.

The means is c, but the principle of debt-free seigniorage enjoyed by the public purse, is long established.

As we have seen, it has simply been eroded by the evolution of the private banking system whose bank-created money has come to exist primarily in non-cash form. That is, in electronic form, transmitted by information technology.

Similarly, our innovative "publicly-created money" can be created as non-cash money. It does not have to be in the form of notes and coins.

People should not have to suffer in an increasingly usurious and debt-soaked society just because the demand for notes and coins has fallen.

It is the responsibility of the government to maintain the debt-free money stock for the benefit of the people.

No other innovation could benefit so many and harm none. The basic research is done and recorded. What remains is to generate credibility and overcome the inertia within government and the civil service establishment.

WHY WE CALL IT "PUBLICLY-CREATED MONEY"
We don't call it "government-created" or "state-created money" because some people have an aversion to the words "government" and "state". Such aversions can lead to bogus objections on the basis of a misunderstanding of words alone. "Oh, you can't let the government create money", such people will say in a knee-jerk manner.

SOME OBJECTIONS WE HAVE FACED
Indeed, one of the main objections which we have encountered and which is found across the political spectrum is that we should not be giving this power to the government because the government, it is claimed, "cannot be trusted".

We would answer this in several ways. We answer it Technically, and we answer it Philosophically.

A technical answer would be that we could ensure that the amount of publicly-created money was limited to a certain amount or percentage each year, which would be objectively measured in some way. For example, it could be the amount necessary to pay off the interest on the national debt, or it could be an amount equivalent to the difference between the rise in the overall money supply from one year to the next -- as was suggested by Michael Rowbotham in his book, The Grip of Death.

The point here being that there would be an objective measure. With this specific amount there could be strict limitations imposed upon its allocation. Perhaps only to be spent on Fixed Public Assets such as schools, hospitals, and roads, or public sector projects decided by the elected Parliament or Congress.

Of course, these spending choices will create controversy, but such political debate is at the heart of our democratic system.

A MODEST PROPOSAL -- DEMOCRATIC CONTROL
Philosophically though, we would answer the question by saying that at the heart of our Reform is a modest proposal -- democratic control!

Money for the People and by the People! Money Reformers, highlight the fundamental monopoly power of money creation enjoyed by the few to the detriment of the many.

We highlight the fundamental question of who has the power to create the money in the first place.

We say, our money supply is a public resource, which should not be exploited for private profit. The creation of money should be a public service, under public control for the public good.

We point to the fact that many of the economic and social ills which beset society and the world today are due to the power to create money being concentrated in the hands of a tiny minority, rather than democratically distributed in the hands of the People.

So, "If", as James Gibb Stuart has written, "we can break the Monopoly of Credit -- the control over the 97%, and rising, of our money supply, presently created by the banking system -- then we have established the right of government to create more, on behalf of the people." (Prosperity, June 04 -- also May 02, June 03 and Jan 04)

MONEY REFORMERS ARE QUESTING FOR REAL DEMOCRACY
Now some others will say, "Well, that is all very well and good but best not talk about that until we have the democratic changes in place which will allow us to implement these reforms safely."

However, life doesn't work that way. You don't start doing something until every other little thing around you is perfect. That would be neurotic.

Rather, you begin as soon as you can and you engage with the reality that is around you, which will always be less than perfect!

So, let us seek Money Reform at the same time as we seek Democratic Reform.

Let us not wait for one before we promote the other.

Let us be clear to locate our programme for reform -- and to locate our opposition to the present monopoly of the banking system -- within a wider struggle for democracy and for social justice, for Americans, for Canadians, for Australians, for British people, and for all the people of the world.

In closing, let me wish the greatest success to the American Monetary Institute and to the valuable and inspirational work which Stephen Zarlenga and his colleagues are doing here.

We have such a powerful truth on our side. Let us tell it widely.

We have such a powerful light on our side.

Let us shine it brightly upon the darkness of the debt-ridden international financial system which enslaves so many.

And by so doing let us, and the American Monetary Institute, bring freedom from debt slavery to America…and to the world.

Please print out, photocopy and distribute these articles. Also copy and paste them to emails, and circulate widely, and please include all the essential contact information below. Thank you.

Essential Further Reading:

PROSPERITY: Freedom from Debt Slavery
is a 4-page quarterly journal which campaigns for publicly-created debt-free money, edited and published by Alistair McConnachie. A 4-issue subscription is available for £10 payable to:
PROSPERITY at

268 Bath Street, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, G2 4JRTel: 0141 332 2214; Fax: 0141 353 6900
admcc@admcc.freeserve.co.uk http://www.ProsperityUK.com
Or you can follow this link to our subscribe page.

The Grip of Death: A study of modern money, debt slavery and destructive economics by Michael Rowbotham, [Jon Carpenter Publishing, 1998] and Goodbye America! Globalisation, debt and the dollar empire by Michael Rowbotham, [Jon Carpenter Publishing, 2000] both available from the address above.

000

http://www.ismennt.is/not/jonasg/jg/jg06/deptfreemoney/deptfreemoney.html

Egilsstaðir, 26.10.2016 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 17:51 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)

26.10.2016 | 00:04

Nýi Landspítalinn, flottur, fyrir starfsfólk og sjúklinga.

Nýi Landspítalinn, flottur. slóð

18.10.2015 | 01:37

slóð

https://youtu.be/_ff7XtzqdAw

klikka á myndir til að þær verði stærri

Egilsstaðir, 25.10.2016 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

	„Ekki að reisa spítalann á besta stað“
Ábyrgðarmaður færslu Tilkynna um óviðeigandi tengingu við frétt

Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 00:05 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)

25.10.2016 | 20:29

Peningar, seðlar. Coins and bills

Og það besta, ég lánaði þér ekki neitt.

slóð

19.2.2016 | 18:40

Peningar, seðlar.

Coins and bills

Spuni, gamla sagan, skírð.

*--- Spuni ---*

klikka á mynd, þá verður hún stærri.

Egilsstaðir, 25.10.2016 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

	Erlendir krónueigendur bíða eftir kosningum
Ábyrgðarmaður færslu Tilkynna um óviðeigandi tengingu við frétt

Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 20:50 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)

24.10.2016 | 22:52

Fóstur eyðing, fóstur deyðing. Hvað á að gera? Á heimilið og börnin að hafa forgang? Er það konan og barnið sem eiga að fá mestu umhyggjuna? Eru það svokallaðir fjárfestar sem fá mesta umhyggju núna þegar þeir hirtu íbúðir fólksins?***

Þú áttir að margfaldast og uppfylla jörðina,

það er að sem flestar sálir,

kæmust í kennsluna á jörðinni,

í mannslíkama.

Þú skilur myndirnar, þótt þú skiljir litla ensku.

000

He performed 1,200 abortions. In new viral video, he wants you to see what abortion really looks like

slóð

https://youtu.be/5THDmys8z30

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/he-performed-1200-abortions.-in-new-videos-he-wants-you-to-see-what-abortio

og á youtube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5THDmys8z30

klikka á myndina, þá verður hún stærri

000

WATCH: A third of pro-choice women change their view of abortion after seeing this viral video

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/watch-one-third-of-pro-choice-women-change-their-view-of-abortion-after-wat

..klikka á myndirnar, þá verða þær stærri..

Áður en ég skoðaði myndbandið...

Eftir að hafa skoðað myndbandið...

Eftir að hafa skoðað myndbandið...

Eftir að hafa skoðað myndbandið...

Til íhugunar.

Egilsstaðir, 04.06.2016 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

*** Kreppufléttan, endurtekið

Bloggar | Breytt 25.10.2016 kl. 22:37 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)

24.10.2016 | 14:39

Athuga, skoða, allt um kring, þá höfum við nústaðreyndirnar. Að loknum bænum, þá höfum við tengst alheimsvitinu, the core, KJARNANUM, eins og Nicola Tesla sagði. Þá höfum við hreinsað hugann, og getum þá móttekið lausnirnar sem við þekkjum ekki í dag.

Athuga, skoða, allt um kring, norrænt, austrænt, suðrænt og vestrænt.

Þegar við höfum lært. þá höfum við nústaðreyndirnar.

Þegar við höfum lokið að fara með bænirnar okkar, þá höfum við tengst betur alheimsvitinu, the core, það er KJARNANUM, eins og Nicola Tesla sagði.

Þá höfum við hreinsað hugann, og getum þá móttekið lausnirnar fyrir framtíðina, lausnirnar sem við þekkjum ekki í dag.

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/russia-insider-a-media-awakening#/

klikka á myndirnar, þá verða þær stærri

Egilsstaðir, 24.10.2016 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

Bloggar | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)

23.10.2016 | 21:49

Conspiracy Theory Review-Analysis; Did Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 disappear by shadowing Singapore Airlines Flight 68? Þessi tilgáta fjölgar möguleikunum. Við trúum engu í þessum málum.

Conspiracy Theory Review-Analysis; Did Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 disappear by shadowing Singapore Airlines Flight 68?

http://www.cabaltimes.com/2015/05/19/mh370-shadowed-sia68/

Þessi tilgáta fjölgar möguleikunum.

Við trúum engu í þessum málum.

Kíkjum aðeins á þetta til að fá hugmynd um hvað er mögulegt.

Það er minnsta mál að flytja eitthvað drasl úr svona flugvélum hvert sem er.

Þetta er eitthvað fyrir snillinginn, Ómar Ragnarsson

Egilsstaðir, 12.10.2016 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

Bloggar | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (2)

23.10.2016 | 21:45

Þakk fyrir þessar upplýsingar. Við þurfum að hafa tölur byggðar á staðreyndum, til að vita hvar við stöndum. þá getum við bætt okkur. Það var smá umræða um tölur sem voru að einhverju leiti byggðar á mati einstaklinga, og komu heldu illa út fyrir Ísland.

Sett á blogg: S i g u r ð u r S i g u r ð a r s o n

Frábær staða Íslands samkvæmt 70 mælikvörðum http://sigsig.blog.is/blog/sigsig/#entry-2182800

23.10.2016 | 14:59

000
Þakk fyrir þessar upplýsingar. Við þurfum að hafa tölur byggðar á staðreyndum, til að vita hvar við stöndum. þá getum við bætt okkur.

Það var smá umræða um tölur sem voru að einhverju leiti byggðar á mati einstaklinga, og komu heldu illa út fyrir Ísland.

ooo

Aftur um könnun hjá Viðskiptaráði Íslands og Nýsköpunarmiðstöði Íslands

Jónas Gunnlaugsson | 17. júní 2015

Reynir Viðskiptaráð Íslands og Nýsköpunarmiðstöð Íslands að handstýra tölum um samkeppnishæfni Íslands?

Jónas Gunnlaugsson | 16. júní 2015

Samkeppnishæfni

Jónas Gunnlaugsson | 26. október 2014

Egilsstaðir, 23.10.2016 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

Bloggar | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)

20.10.2016 | 10:41

FIH bankinn í Danmörku var veð fyrir láninu til Kaupþings 2008. Veðið glataðist að því er virðist, vegna framgöngu Danskra fjármálayfirvalda, og í söluferlinu.

Ég var að hlusta á Kastljós, 19.10.2016

Þar var rætt um FIH bankann, sem var veð fyrir láni til Kaupþings.

Við verðum að hafa í huga að veðið glataðist að því er virðist, vegna framgöngu Danskra fjármálayfirvalda.

000

270 milljarða króna tap af handvömm og fólsku?

21 apríl 2015

Eftir Hannes Hólmstein Gissurarson

http://www.mbl.is/greinasafn/grein/1550562/?t=697876767&_t=1476952753.88

FIH-banki gott veð

... Greiða skyldi út 1,9 milljarða danskra króna í upphafi, en frá afganginum skyldi draga tap frá miðju ári 2010 og til ársloka 2012. Strax og hinir nýju eigendur öðluðust yfirráð yfir bankanum, hófust þeir handa við að færa allt hugsanlegt tap á þetta tímabil (í stað þess að venjulega dreifist slíkt tap á mörg ár, en með því má lágmarka það). Stjórnendur bankans og hinn kunni fjármálamaður Fritz Schur, einkavinur dönsku konungsfjölskyldunnar, fengu að kaupa hlutabréf í bankanum á sérkjörum. Eigendur FIH banka gengu svo hart fram í fjárhagslegri endurskipulagningu hans, að afgangurinn af verðinu til íslenska seðlabankans hvarf í tapi, 3,1 milljarður danskra króna. Jafnframt seldu þeir fasteignalánasöfn bankans til danskrar ríkisstofnunar og önnur útlánasöfn til einkaaðila og tilkynntu 2014, að bankinn yrði lagður niður.

Lítt hafði gengið á eigið fé við þessar aðgerðir, og var það í árslok 2014 5,7 milljarðar danskra króna.

Talið er, að kaupendur bankans muni fá fjárfestingu sína fjórfalda til baka. ...

000

FIH bankinn seldur á 80 til 100 milljarða

07:54 18. SEPTEMBER 2010

http://www.visir.is/fih-bankinn-seldur-a-80-til-100-milljarda/article/2010273362674

... Berlinske Tidende hefur það eftir heimildum að skilanefnd Kaupþings, formlegur eigandi FIH, sé síður en svo ánægð með málalokin.

Salan á FIH var knúin í gegn af bankaumsýslu Danmerkur (Finansiel Stabilitet) en skilanefndin telur að hægt hefði verið að ná fram betra verði fyrir bankann ef hann væri seldur síðar. ...

... Fram hefur komið í fréttum Berlinske Tidende að ATP lífeyrissjóðurinn hafi verið í kjöraðstöðu við kaupin á FIH þar sem sjóðurinn hafði veitt bankanum 15 milljarða danskra kr. lánalínu í kjölfar fjármálakreppunnar á síðasta ári.

Berlinske hefur eftir heimildarmönnum að um sé að ræða mjög hagstætt verð á bankanum fyrir ATP, PFA og Folksam, nánast útsöluverð.

Það verði að skoða í því ljósi að um næstu mánaðarmót fellur niður ríkisábyrgð sem FIH fékk gegnum bankpakke II á 50 milljarða danskra kr. skuldabréfaútgáfu bankans. Niðurfellingin olli svo aftur því að Finansiel Stabilitet knúði fram söluna á FIH núna. ...

000

Segir tap Seðlabankans af FIH 60 milljarða

21.04.2015 - 15:16

http://www.ruv.is/frett/segir-tap-sedlabankans-af-fih-60-milljarda

Í grein sem Hannes ritar í Morgunblaðið segir að við söluna á FIH hafi kaupverðið verið ákveðið fimm milljarðar danskra króna, og að greiða átti út 1,9 milljarða, en frá eftirstöðvum skyldi draga tap FIH-banka frá miðju ári 2010 og til ársloka 2014. „Strax og hinir nýju eigendur öðluðust yfirráð yfir bankanum, hófust þeir handa við að færa allt hugsanlegt tap á þetta tímabil,“ skrifar Hannes, og segir að með því að dreifa tapinu á lengra tímabil hefði mátt lágmarka það.

Ennfremur skrifar Hannes: „Eigendur FIH banka gengu svo hart fram í fjárhagslegri endurskipulagningu hans, að afgangurinn af verðinu til íslenska seðlabankans hvarf í tapi, 3,1 milljarður danskra króna.“ Tapið jafngildi sem nemur um sextíu milljörðum íslenskra króna. Hinir nýju eigendur hafi aftur á móti stórgrætt á viðskiptunum.

„Talið er, að kaupendur bankans muni fá fjárfestingu sína fjórfalda til baka,“ skrifar Hannes.

000

20.10.2016 | 09:55

Pólitískir fréttaskýringar í kufli fræðimennsku.

Söluferlið

000

Leita á Google, til dæmis,

lán seðlabanka íslands til kaupþings

000

http://kjarninn.is/skyring/2016-10-19-neydarlan-kaupthings-hvad-gerdist-hvenaer-hverjir-toku-akvordun-og-hvert-foru-peningarnir/

Egilsstaðir, 20.10.2016 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 23:02 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (1)

19.10.2016 | 21:11

Stórir hópar virðast vera orðnir háðir boðsferðum til Brussel og fyrir boðsferðirnar borga aðilar með því að reyna að eyða úr stjórnarskrá, banni við því að allt vald fari úr landi og þá auðlindirnar líka.

Eru einhverjir að reyna að búa til ósanna heimsmynd.

Súnítar eru að berjast við Shíta í Sýrlandi.

ISIS eru Súnítar.

Tyrkland, þeir eru Súnítar og berjast við Kúrda og Shíta, en segjast vera að berjast við ISIS.

Sádar, og fleiri flóaþjóðir eru Súnítar, þeir styðja ISIS en segjast vilja koma til Sýrlands og vilji berjast við ISIS.

Margt fjölmiðlafólk og embættismenn sýnast trúa því að þeim leyfist að blekkja fólkið um það sem er að gerast í landinu.

Hvernig má það vera að stjórnmálaliðið og allir sósíalistar, það er þeir sem segjast vera menntamenn, segjast vera trúlausir,

það er, eru nústaðreyndatrúar og kalla sig oft þjóðlega sósíalista, vinstri sósíalista eða kommúnista.

000

Stórir hópar virðast vera orðnir háðir boðsferðum til Brussel og fyrir boðsferðirnar borga aðilar með því að reyna að eyða úr stjórnarskrá,

banni við því að allt vald fari úr landi og þá auðlindirnar líka.

Á sama hátt skríðum við fyrir fjármálafyrirtækjunum, sem vinna eftir reglum sem þeim eru settar, og reglurnar eru allar svindl.

Lög ESB eru oft sniðin að því að stórfyrirtækin megi vaða yfir löndin og ef Þjóðirnar reyna að verjast, þá eru lögin notuð til að sekta þjóðirnar.

Grikkir voru troðnir í skítinn, þeir voru svo óheppnir að hafa tekið upp evruna.

000

hér kemur slóð á netið

Hvaða afl er það sem kennir Sósíalistum að hætta að hugsa, og kalla bara, RASISTI, RASISTI, RASISTI? Er ráð að byrja að læra að hugsa, ana ekki út í foraðið, ofsóknirnar? Hvað gerðu Nationalsósíalistar og Kommúnistar, Var ráðist á vormennina?

STOP

Egilsstaðir, 02.03.2016 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 21:21 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)

19.10.2016 | 11:57

Americans have been told, yet again, that there is an epidemic of crime against black people in this country. But is there really a race war, and if so, which side is actually waging it

BILL WHITTLE: FERGUSON AND THE REAL RACE WAR

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGTUcS-yQtQ

smella á myndina til að fá hana stærri

Published on Aug 20, 2014

„Since the shooting of Michael Brown by a white policeman and the ensuing riots and looting in Ferguson, MO, Americans have been told, yet again, that there is an epidemic of crime against black people in this country. But is there really a race war, and if so, which side is actually waging it?“

000

Ég læt vera að birta athugasemdir einstakra manna.

Það er nauðsynlegt að lesa nokkrar, til að fræðast um málefnið.

Ég get ekki þýtt talið, ég heyri ekki öll orðin.

En þetta er forvitnilegt, að mér sýnist, og töluglöggir geta kennt okkur hinum.

Egilsstaðir, 14.10.2016 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

Bloggar | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)

19.10.2016 | 00:50

Reynum að stöðva hugsanlegt stríð, hver eftir sinni getu. Ég set hér nokkrar slóðir til að sýna umræðuna. Flestir fjölmiðlar fela stríðshættuna. Allir trúflokkar biðji fyrir jörðinni og mannfólkinu.

War With Russia Is The Democrat’s Oct. Surprise

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuH5Utoiazg

Reynum að stöðva hugsanlegt stríð, hver eftir sinni getu.

Ég set hér nokkrar slóðir til að sýna umræðuna.

Flestir fjölmiðlar fela stríðshættuna.

Allir trúflokkar biðji fyrir jörðinni og mannfólkinu.

Hvað er hér á ferðinni?

Egilsstaðir, 18.10.2016 Jónas Gunnlaugsson

Smella á myndina til að gera hana stærri.

000

Afritað hér upp.

It's Zero Hour Fyrir 22 klukkustundum (breytt)

This will be a limited nuclear exchange. It will be just enough chaos to cause people to utterly tremble with fear. Then, when the people of the world are fully distraught, the ones who created the chaos, will conveniently offer the "solution." Their solution will be a global UN government, where no country will declare war "ever" again. And out of fear, the people will willingly stand behind this new world government because it will bring in "peace." Think about the parallels of everything right now. The world economies are BARELY holding on. Tensions are worse than EVER. And weather disasters are setting records. These three things are also three agenda's the UN and elites have been pushing. A world government, with economic unity, and climate change. And once war begins or the economy crashes.. it will domino the others. And THEN, when all things have hit the ground.. these treaties signed will take affect, and the power and sovereignty of all nations will be handed over to the UN, in the name of peace. And the people will be willing and cheer it. The whole US will not be destroyed. Either way, lots of people will die soon. From wars and natural disasters. Everything is so perfectly planned to shake the world to its core. And those climate change agenda's and global governance agendas will all suddenly make sense as everything becomes a unified. In between all of this, and especially after a UN world government is established, Christians, of all beliefs will be persecuted. First, legal persecution, then physical persecution. We will be called bigots. You see this new push for political correctness? You'll see soon how Church sermons will be labeled as "hate-speech" then, the government will take away 501C3 tax exemptions, then, start closing churches. Only those who conform the Word of God will remain open. But they will teach deceit and the new world religion. Sin will be allowed. Homosexuality and all immorality be praised and God and His teachings will be shut out and illegal. ""If the world hates you, remember that it hated me first." John 15:18 "and you will be hated by all for my name's sake" Matthew 10 We are literally living on the cliffs edge of chaos. Its TODAY you have to seek Christ and salvation. Ask yourself.. where does all this evil and hatred come from, in the hearts of these elites? Your only escape and precious asset is your soul. They can take your house, car, and life.. but they can NEVER take your salvation in Christ.. although they try so much through immoral media and so on. But we are encouraged to yank ourselves out of the world, out of a sinful life and seek Christ. And I tell you, I haven't had such unexplainable joy in my soul as I do now. Why? Because: "Now when these things begin to happen, look up and lift up your heads, because your redemption draws near.”

000

Lesa meira

Sýna minna

Svara 1

Fela svör

MrMorethanexist Fyrir einum degi

Hillary is taking the blood of BABIES to keep her alive.

Chris Burnside Fyrir 7 klukkustundum

No. It's the blood of babies. The abortion thing is spot on, like a vampire owning a blood bank, gotta keep the supply lines up and running.

GERAJO Fyrir einum degi

Russians are good people and they like Americans... it's just the government in the United States of America is cuckoo

deplorable Fyrir 5 klukkustundum

i voted already trump 16. holy cow , a war with russia? what a mess that would be

ÐÐ½Ð´ÑÐµÐ¹ Ð¡Ð¼Ð¸ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð² Fyrir einum degi

I do not want to fight with the Americans!((((

Stephen Larson Fyrir 2 klukkustundum

The problem is our American government is trying to create a United States of United Nations the Assad regime is in the way one government supports Assad one opposes it that's gonna be what starts this stupid ass war it's ridiculous we should be going to war with anyone

Stephen Larson Fyrir 2 klukkustundum

I thought we as a world were better than this by now but I guess not

It's Zero Hour Fyrir 22 klukkustundum (breytt)

Lesa meira

Sýna minna

Svara 9 10

Hleður... Skoða öll 2 svör

Skoða öll 2 svör

Bob Mitchell Fyrir 16 klukkustundum

It's Zero Hour Well thought out...sadly good chance you will be proved right...hope the head of the US Army is one of the first to go!

Lee Harvey Oswald Fyrir einum degi

America has NO proof of Russia hacking us. Everyone saw this stupid crap from the US coming.

TheBlues Ine Fyrir 10 klukkustundum

its China,,, they hacked Australia as well ...

joann robinson Fyrir einum degi

I'm voting Trump..only idiot would vote Hillary

Eric Rosas Fyrir einum degi

Jack Parker lol

The Medical Mystery Fyrir einum degi

Of course Hitlary wants a war with Russia, who here hasn't seen videos of those underground cities that run from Maine to Oregon and all points between? They will all be deep underground with those thousands of semi trailers of food, water, supplies and military equipment. We are all expendable to her since they have micro organisms when released can eat any radio active particles after a bomb goes off. So they have a good game plan, wipe out most of the country, hide for a while and then start over with a limited number of people.

The Medical Mystery Fyrir einum degi

+rascalMatt17 To answer your question about micro organisms that can clean radioactive particles, well, here is just one of many..... http://www.seeker.com/how-bacteria-clean-up-nuclear-waste-1765404882.html

Michael O'Brien Fyrir einum degi

They've dropped the idea for the FEMA camps so??

Tanya Mongeau Fyrir einum degi

maybe everyone will repent their sins and turn Back to God to heal our land! !!

need2burn Fyrir 3 klukkustundum

The what ancestor? The first? It doesn't work like that. You don't just have an ancestor who popped out a human. You would not see a "first ancestor" so to speak. One, because we're talking hundreds of millions (even billions) of years and very few things up end ever being fossilized and/or discovered, and 2. evolution is like the hour hand on a clock. It appears to not move but we know that it changes slowly and gradually, so you only see differences over huge lengths of time. We may never find every piece of the puzzle, over 99% of every species that has ever lived is extinct. Oh so you were there when your god created everything a few thousand years back? Can you answer how distant stars light can be seen here when they are hundreds of millions of light years away if the Earth is only as old as the Bible states?

Hentai Kami-Sama Fyrir 2 klukkustundum

+need2burn the guy's a troll so stop replying to him. It's made pretty obvious by his previous comment. No one is that fucking stup-.....anyways he's a troll.

Anton K Fyrir einum degi

I have a mosquito bite on my arm. THE RUSSIANS DID IT.

RubberusDuckus Fyrir einum degi

They're poking the bear, in case Trump wins then they can point the blame to Trump. If Hillary wins, they'll still blame Trump because he said something mean more than a decade ago.

Maldrannon Fyrir einum degi

Doesn't matter, because if Trump wins he's made it clear that he wants to smooth things over with Russia, which would probably take no more than a meeting with Putin.

Dustin Fyrir einum degi

Democrats are evil scumbags. Always were. I recommend you watch "Hillary's America". It's unbelievable how they use blacks as voting cattle nowadays and what they did to them in the past. How are these people voting Democrat is beyond me...

C Lonie Fyrir einum degi

Foreign Globalists are Jews right?

James Fyrir einum degi

If Hilary has Parkinsons disease she should not hold office. It is a form of dementia and effects the way you think for the worse e.g. aggression etc etc

Alex Burns Fyrir 18 klukkustundum

OR IT COULD BE ALL THE COCAINE SHE AND BILL HAS DONE. COCAINE IS A HELL OF A DRUG

0000000000000000000000000000000

Obama War With Russia To Stop Trump! Wikileaks Revealed To Americans By Trump! Disaster For Hillary! - Lengd: 15:21. ProjectClarity39.909 áhorf