Hetjurnar eru alltaf að bjarga heiminum.
Í Kúbu deilunni, fann Bandaríski sjóherinn einn disel kafbát frá Sovét Ríkjunum við Kúbu.
Bandaríkin vissu ekki að kafbáturinn var vopnaður kjarnorku tundurskeyti.
Var ákveðið að varpa djúpsprengjum nálægt kafbátnum, til að neyða hann upp á yfirborðið.
Kennedy forseti Bandaríkjanna, á þessum tíma, og fyrrverandi kapteinn í sjóhernum, hafði áhyggjur af því að þetta gæti misskilist sem árás.
Kafbáturinn hafði kafað svo djúpt, að Rússarnir voru sambandslausir við umheiminn.
Þrír foringjar í kafbátnum, urðu að vera sammála um að skjóta kjarnorku tundurskeytinu.
Öll þessi læti urðu til þess, að tveir af þessum þremur foringjum, vildu verjast, og skjóta kjarnorku tundurskeytinu.
Einn foringinn, stóð fastur fyrir og vildi ekki svara árásinni.
Bjargaði þessi maður þjóðunum frá því að lenda í kjarnorku stríði?
Þessi maður var af mörgum talinn hafa orðið valdur að því að auðmýkja Sovét Ríkin.
Honum var ekki refsað, en þurfti að þola þessar ásakanir.
Nú sjáum við, að þessi maður var mikil hetja, og bjargaði okkur frá mikilli geislavirkni, og ef til vill kjarnorku stríði.
Það er annar Rússi sem bjargaði málunum þegar tækin sýndu falskar upplýsingar, og stöðvaði kjarnorku „gagnárás“ frá Rússlandi.
Hér er blogg um hann.
slóð
Jónas Gunnlaugsson | 19. september 2017
'I was just doing my job': Soviet officer who averted nuclear war dies at age 77 Published time: 17 Sep, 2017 19:01 https://www.rt.com/news/403625-nuclear-soviet-officer-died/ Get short URL Stanislav Petrov © Sergey Pirigov / Sputnik A Soviet officer who
000
Það eru margir fleiri, sem hafa bjargað þjóðunum frá kjarnorkustríði, og einnig hér á Vesturlöndum, en margt er falið.
000
Athuga. Það er talað inn á vídeóið, og þá mismæli og því um líkt. Síðan er sjálfvirk talvél, sem hlustar á talið og breytir því í prentaðan texta.
Ég skrifa þetta upp, en breyti engu, nema að skipa því niður í setningar.
08:14 Following his history altering decision Vasili Arkhipov returned to the Soviet Union, but he was not received as any kind of hero.
Many of the crew members aboard the russian submarines were forced to see the event as one of a failure and humiliation thoug Arkhipov was never punished as a result of the incident.
His wife was later said that it was not something that he-d like to talk about and that quote he felt they hadn-t appreciated what they had gone through on the submarine, over those tense few days in the caribbean
The incident aboard the b-59 was kept quiet for decades.
US naval officers aboard the Coney and other ships in the area werw sworn to secrecy.
Only after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 were documents detailing the incident from the Russian side including the account of Freedom Orlov made puplicly available.
Until that point the Us had a little idea that the b-59 was carrying a nuclear-tipped torpedo and the historians who had documented the Cuban Missile Crisis finally got a murky picture of just how close the conflict came to erupting into full-scale nuclear war.
Even more incredibly the decision to avoid such a catastrophe ultimateli came down to a single dissenting officer with the fate of the world in his hands.
A for what kind of world we would be living in without his intervention we will have to remain in the dark.
klikka á mynd, þá stærri
Birt 27. jún. 2018
Inside the Soviet submarine, the crew could feel the impact of explosions shaking the walls.
They waited for hours, enduring the intense pressure of U.S. depth charges, desperate to receive some kind of signal or call to action.
Meanwhile, the air conditioning had malfunctioned, and the men aboard were overheated, exhausted, fevered with worry and anticipation.
They knew it was their responsibility was to fire their nuclear-tipped torpedo in the event of an attack on Russia, and in the intense chaos they debated how to act.
Had the crisis between John F. Kennedy, the U.S. President, and Nikita Khrushchev, the Soviet Premier, finally boiled over?
How close had the world come to witnessing the atomic apocalypse feared by so many over the course of the crisis?
Egilsstaðir, 29.07.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 09:13 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Sett á blogg: Valdimar Samúelsson
https://skolli.blog.is/blog/skolli/entry/2220076/
Eins og sagt er í athugasemd, þá þarf Ríkið aðeins að greiða fyrir verðmatið, verðmætið. Þá hefur Ríkið eignina.
Ef ríkið skrifar peningabókhaldið, þá getur það skrifað töluna, og skuldar engum.
Einhversstaðar sá ég að aðilar voru að vandræðast með það , hvernig Bandaríkin gætu greitt allar útistandandi skuldir.
Þá kom einn með svarið, engin vandi, þeir skrifa aðeins ávísun í dollurum og borga skuldirnar.
Það er að Bandaríkin hætti að taka lán hjá einkabanka, sem skrifar aðeins töluna, og skrifi töluna sjálf.
Þetta gætu verið gamlar upplýsingar. Fasteignaskattur skal vera 1,32% af ... Heimilt er sveitarstjórn að lækka eða fella niður fasteignaskatt
af bújörðum á meðan þær eru nýttar ...
Fasteignaskattur fer til sveitarfélagana, þannig að við verðum að taka tillit til þess, þegar við endurheimtum landið, landareignirnar og íbúðarhúsin.
Þarna mætti setja í lög að fasteignaskattur væri 2%, og færðist sá partur, 2% af jörðinni sem eign á Ríkið.
Ef bóndi fær erfðafestu á jörð, og verður þá varðgæslumaður yfir landareigninni, þá fær hann greitt fyrir þá vinnu.
Bóndinn, fjölskyldan, á að ráða við að byggja jörðina. Sjálfstæðir bændur gætu haft samráð með nýtingu jarðanna.
Fjölskyldurnar, eiga að eiga íbúðirnar og íbúðarhúsin. Úti um landið, á að vera mikið af íbúðum og íbúðarhúsum til nota í ferðaþjónustu.
Ef náttúru hamfarir verða á landinu, þá er hægt að nýta þessar íbúðir fyrir fólkið.
Vel má hugsa sér að sumarhúsið, sé um leið varahúsnæði.
Mjög gott er að fjölskyldurnar sjái um leigu á einni eða tveimur íbúðum í ferðaþjónust, og læri þannig að bjarga sér.
Ef til vill átti að lækka hótelskattinn, en ekki að íþyngja atvinnusköpun heimilanna, með því að hækka skattinn á nýsköpunnar bjargræði heimilanna.
Þetta er smá leikur, það er óþarfi að vandræðast með málefnið.
Jarðir og íbúðir séu eign sjálfstæðra bænda og fjölskylda.
Í Bandaríkjunum, er sagt að búið sé að eyðileggja miðstéttina.
Þá er komin elíta og svo þrælarnir, sem þiggur allt í gegn um elítuna, sem tekur þá bróðurpartinn til sín.
Allt sem þrællinn fær hefur elítan hækkað um til dæmis 100%, sem hún tekur til sín.
Verum óhræddir við að leita lausna, og endurbæta lausnirnar eftir þörfum.
Egilsstaðir, 22.07.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 14:20 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Slóð
Kennsla í góðri peninga, bókhalds stjórnun. Allir læri og hjálpi til við endursköpun fjármála bókhaldsins, peninganna, ekki síst að hjálpa þeim sem eru fastir í gamla peningatrúarkerfinu. Peningur er bókhald, skrifuð tala.
22.3.2018 | 11:19
000
This is the "biggest bubble in the history of mankind and it's going to burst," Ron Paul says
Look to the stock market and you’d assume Wall Street was doing just fine. The S&P 500 has come back to March highs, the Dow is back to positive for 2018, and the Nasdaq is at fresh records.
It’s all built on shaky foundations, said longtime market bear and former Republican Congressman Ron Paul.
This market is in the “biggest bubble in the history of mankind,” and when it bursts, it could cut the stock market in half, he told CNBC’s “Futures Now” Thursday.
“I see trouble ahead, and it originates with too much debt, too much spending,” Paul said.
This isn’t the first time Paul has made such dire warnings. During a “Futures Now” appearance in August 2017, he predicted a 50 percent drop in the market, a call he has doubled down on a number of times since. Since that appearance, the S&P 500 has rallied 15 percent.
Paul belongs to the Libertarian Party, a faction that emphasizes constrained government spending. He sees federal spending and monetary policy as dual forces inflating a market bubble.
“The Congress spending and the Federal Reserve manipulation of monetary policy and interest rates — debt is too big, the current account is in bad shape, foreign debt is bad and it’s not going to change,” he said.
Paul isn’t alone in his critique. A number of politicians have voiced concern over ballooning deficits, including current House Speaker Paul Ryan, who raised a warning on the nation’s debt in 2012.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that federal deficits will average $1.2 trillion a year from 2019 to 2028, according to its April economic outlook. Its 2018 deficit estimates rose by $242 billion over previous forecasts made in June 2017. The federal agency said the revision was mainly owing to lower projected revenues tied to tax reform.
“We have a president who likes to spend. He is not concerned about the deficit,” said Paul.
To Paul the decision-making arm of the Fed is equally at fault in creating a market bubble.
“The Fed will keep inflating, and that distorts things,” Paul continued. “Now they’re trying to unwind their balance sheet. I don’t think they’re going to get real far on that.”
The Fed is more than two years into its rate-hiking cycle. In conjunction with rate hikes, the Fed is also unloading assets from its balance sheet, which expanded to $4.5 trillion during its post-financial crisis quantitative-easing program.
Paul is not confident much will change to divert from the disaster he predicts.
“The government will keep spending, and the Fed will keep inflating, and that distorts things,” said Paul. “When you get into a situation like this, the debt has to be eliminated. You have to liquidate the debt and the malinvestment.”
Paul reiterated his call on Thursday for a potential 50 percent sell-off on the stock market.
Related video: A growing number of market watchers warn that a bubble is upon us
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 23:09 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Það yrði ekki glæsilegur listi, sem sýndi hvað margir fermetrar af landi,
fasteignum og fyrirtækjum hefur verið selt á vakt hinna ýmsu ráðherra, yfir árin.
Ekki væri verra að útbúa lista um heitavatnið, kaldavatnið, og orkulindirnar, vatnsorku möguleika, og hitaorku möguleika, sem við verðum að ná til okkar aftur.*
Að sjálfsögðu, látum við fólkið vita, hver á í raun, hin einstöku fyrirtæki.
Allar eignir verða að vera skráðar á einstakling.
Til dæmis, ef Íslendingar mega ekki kaupa, nema 2% af útlandinu, og þá mega
útlendingar ekki kaupa nema 2% af Íslandi.
Rafveiturnar, vatnsveiturnar, skólpveiturnar og vegakerfið í eigu fólksins,
hafa skilað okkur ódýrustu þjónustunni.
Ég las um það að stórfyrirtæki væru að kaupa upp allar vatnsbyrgðir á jörðinni, og væru nú búin að kaupa allt hreint vatn í Suður-Afríku, en þar eru miklir þurrkar.
Það er hægt að láta rigna í kring um landið, svo að ekki rigni í landinu.
Þá fæst hærra verð fyrir hreina vatnið.
Kínverjar láta rigna uppi í fjöllunum, þar sem stórfljótin eiga upptök sín, þar vilja þeir fá vatnið.
slóð
9.4.2018 | 23:39
Kína ætlar að láta rigna og snjóa á landsvæði, sem er 15 sinnum stærra en Ísland, eða 1,6 miljón ferkíló- metra. Frá 2013 hefur Kína búið til 55 milljarða tonna, af rigningu og snjó á ári. Tugir þúsunda brennsluhólfa í fjallahlíðum Tíbet, silver iodide.
https://jonasg-eg.blog.is/blog/jonasg-eg/entry/2214480/
Jafnvel það, að leggja spilakapal í tölvunni, þá er reynt að ná einokun á því.
Þá er komið í veg fyrir að þú getir notað gömlu forritin í nýjustu tölvunum,
og reynt að fá þig til að stofna bankareikning, til að þú verðir að greiða
stanslaust mínútu gjald til einhvers, ef þú leggur kapal í tölvunni.
Þetta er sama spilamennskan og með peningana, peningabókhaldið.
Þú veist, að peningar eru aðeins bókhald.
Svo segist einkabankaeigandinn vera að lána þér, hann skrifar aðeins tölu, og vill alls ekki fá töluna aftur, hún talan, er aðeins bókhald, heldur eignina.
Þess vegna býr hann til verðbólguna, og síðan kreppuna.
Til þess var gengishækkunin á íslensku krónunni, þá geta allir keypt meira af útlendum vörum, og þá verður íslenska ríkið skuldugra, og fyrirtækin geta síður greitt lánin sín.
Þá nær bankaeigandinn frekar fyrirtækjunum til sín.
Auðvitað látum við ekki spila á okkur.
Við látum ekki setja mælir á andardráttinn, til að einhver geti selt okkur loftið,
sem við öndum að okkur.
Ef að einhverju fyrirtæki tækist að spilla andrúmsloftinu þannig að allir yrðu að vera með súrefniskút, þá væru súrefniskúta framleiðendur í essinu sínu.
Ekki gleyma því að Nikola Tesla kom með orkuturna, en það var galli á turnunum, það var ekki hægt að setja mæli á orkuna, hún var allstaðar tiltæk.
Við víxlararnir, létum brjóta orkuturnana niður.
Jesú kallaði okkur víxlarana, og rak okkur víxlarana út úr musterinu.
slóðir
*
Það eru slóðir á blogginu mínu sem styðja við þessi skrif.
leitað að selja á
Hann er þarna skaparinn, gamli karlinn með skeggið, og hlær, fellir tár, hvenær ætlar þú að koma og leita ráða hjá mér? - Bestu fisksölufyrirtæki í heimi, og Orkuveita Suðurnesja, voru seld af FJÁRFESTUM, til Kanada.
Nú kynna stjórnvöld, hve snjöll fjármálafyrirtækin, hafa verið að nota fjármálaflétturnar til að ná öllu af fyrirtækjum og heimilum, með hinum ýmsu KREPPUFLÉTTUM. Nú verður gaman að fá samþykki dómstólana, fyrir kreppufléttunum.
Við kennum það ekki að bankinn skrifi aðeins bókhald. Við kennum það ekki, að ef allir greiða skuldina sína, þá fær bankinn til baka, töluna sem er og var ekkert.
Hér er sagt að það sé komið að uppskeru tíma hjá seðlabönkunum. Þetta er gaman að sjá. Central Banks Are In The Harvest Phase Of The Economic Collapse
Láttu ekki múta þér með þínum eigin peningum. Þú mátt ekki selja peningaprentunarréttinn. Bankinn skrifar bókhald, skrifar tölu, og segist vera að lána þér. Það er búið að spila með okkur nógu lengi. Byggja upp -- i n n v i ð i n a.
Niðurstöður fyrir þjóðgarðinn
https://jonasg-egi.blog.is
7 bloggfærslur fundust
Það að selja hlunnindajörð út úr sveitarfélagi er rétt eins og að selja kvóta út úr sjávarplássi. Vatn, vatnsfall, og veiðiréttindi, er gullnáma til framtíðar litið. - landbúnaðurinn, getur ekki keppt um jarðirnar. svakalegt. Enginn þorir að rísa upp.
Jóhannes Sigfússon, bóndi á Gunnarsstöðum í Þistilfirði. Fréttir 21. júní 2018 Bændablaðið http://www.bbl.is/frettir/frettir/vid-verdum-ad-koma-bondum-a-thetta-vid-erum-ad-missa-landid-ur-hondum-okkar/20151/ Við verðum að koma böndum á þetta, við erum að
Ástralía stöðvaða söluna á jörðinni Anna Creek sem er 1% af Ástralíu, til Kínverja. Ísland seldi Grímsstaði á fjöllum, og útlendir, sem stofna einkahlutafélag er sagt að megi kaupa allt á Íslandi. Er einkahlutafélagið þá kallað íslenskt?
Australia blocks sale of largest farm owner to foreigners Published 9:16 PM ET Wed, 18 Nov 2015 https://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/18/australia-blocks-sale-of-largest-farm-owner-s-kiman-to-chinese-buyers.html Concerned it was losing control of its food
Hann er þarna skaparinn, gamli karlinn með skeggið, og hlær, fellir tár, hvenær ætlar þú að koma og leita ráða hjá mér? - Bestu fisksölufyrirtæki í heimi, og Orkuveita Suðurnesja, voru seld af FJÁRFESTUM, til Kanada.
Hátt gengi, það snýst um að fiskvinnslu fyrirtækin og ferðaþjónustan og öll önnur útflutningsfyrirtæki, fá færri krónur fyrir hvern dollar, eða hverja evru. Þá getur fiskvinnslan, og ferðaþjónustan síður greitt af lánum sínum. 000 Við verðum að muna,
Við höldum ekki Íslandi, landareignum, húseignum og atvinnufyrirtækjum, með því að hlusta á fagurgala. Nú heyrist frá ungafólkinu, að eina leiðin til að fá jarðnæði, sé að gerast leiguliði hjá einhverjum útlendingi.
Sett á blog: Ásthildur Cesil Þórðardóttir http://asthildurcesil.blog.is/blog/asthildurcesil/ Við höldum ekki Íslandi, landareignum, húseignum og atvinnufyrirtækjum, með því að hlusta á fagurgala. Nú heyrist frá ungafólkinu, að eina leiðin til að fá
Ratcliffe kaupir Grímsstaði á Fjöllum, ekki vegna laxa, ekki vegna gæsa, ekki vegna norðurljósa. Hann keypti Grímsstaði, vegna þess að enginn Íslendingur gat keypt Grímsstaði. Ísland er komið á alþjóðlegan markað,
Ratcliffe kaupir Grímsstaði á Fjöllum, ekki vegna laxa, ekki vegna gæsa, ekki vegna norðurljósa. Hann keypti Grímsstaði, vegna þess að enginn Íslendingur gat keypt Grímsstaði. Ísland er komið á alþjóðlegan markað, og þá á Íslendingurinn engan
Ratcliffe kaupir Grímsstaði á Fjöllum, ekki vegna laxa, ekki vegna gæsa, ekki vegna norðurljósa. Hann keypti Grímsstaði, vegna þess að enginn Íslendingur gat keypt Grímsstaði. Ísland er komið á alþjóðlegan markað,
Ratcliffe kaupir Grímsstaði á Fjöllum, ekki vegna laxa, ekki vegna gæsa, ekki vegna norðurljósa. Hann keypti Grímsstaði, vegna þess að enginn Íslendingur gat keypt Grímsstaði. Ísland er komið á alþjóðlegan markað, og þá á Íslendingurinn engan
Það er gott að þið vekjið athyggli á því, að við getum vaknað upp við það að stórþjóð eigi allt landrými á Íslandi. Vinsamlega færið ykkur af landinun okkar, úr íbúðarhúsunum okkar og vinnustöðunum okkar. Þið getið bara farið í Þjóðgarðinn.
"Seljum fossa og fjöll, - föl er náttúran öll..."? - omarragnarsson.blog.is Sett á bloggið hjá: Ómar Ragnarsson http://omarragnarsson.blog.is/blog/omarragnarsson/entry/2186436/ Það er gott að þið vekjið athyggli á því, að við getum vaknað upp við það að
Egilsstaðir, 14.07.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Bloggar | Breytt 16.7.2018 kl. 23:20 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
No, The EU Is Not Militarizing Africa To Halt Migration, But Simply To Organize It
We offer a counter-analysis to “EU Militarizes Africa to Halt Migration” that appeared on Strategic Culture Foundation.
While the original article offers an interesting study of the latest neo-imperialist military involvement of European countries in Africa, spearheaded by French President Macron, we beg to differ on what is going to be the impact on migration flows and what are the EU goals. Recent events suggest a rather different conclusion. Let’s go in order.
Last summer, when the news that NGOs were shipping migrants to Italy and cooperating with traffickers surfaced, the newly elected Emmanuel Macron quickly came up with a solution: hotspots in Africa where people seeking protection could go to and apply for the status of refugee,and, if granted such a status, could be moved to Europe in an official way.
The plan has been operational for a few weeks now: the first batches of positively-verified asylum seekers have been moved to France and Italy,while European governments are sending their troops to Africa to help manage the flow. The first groups come from the most afflicted area, Libya, due to its lack of a stable government, ironically resulting from French intervention of a few years ago, when the “Arab Spring’’ brought about the removal of Muammar Qaddafi, leaving the country in a state of perpetual civil war. After the Italian government had partially (up to 6000 migrants every month are still shipped to Italy) sealed the Libyan route, those who couldn’t make it found themselves trapped in the North African country and NGOs started lamenting human rights abuses and slavery market in development.
The process is referred to as “humanitarian corridors’’ and is lobbied heavily by the open borders civil society. Asylum seekers whose request is accepted are transferred to their destination, while those whose request was rejected are moved back to their home country.
Finally, last week, on the occasion of the ‘’International Migrants Day’’ the EU Commissioner for Migration, Home Affairs and Citizenship Dimitris Avramopoulos penned an article for Politico,expressing his commitment to open borders migration policies and outlining the EU’s role on the matter: the flow will not be stopped, but managed.
Hence our different conclusion from Strategic Culture: it is true that the EU liberal establishment is rattled by the rise of right-wing anti-immigration parties, most notably the latest alliance forming the Austrian government between the recently elected Sebastian Kurz and the far-right Freedom party; however, the EU establishment finds that such popular rejection of their policies is unjustified, coming from ungrateful people who do not see the bigger picture, fail to appreciate the alleged benefits of vibrant and diverse multicultural societies, or are simply misguided by populist politicians or fake news from Russia.
The commitment to free movement of labour, a key component of modern liberalism, combined with that of capital and goods, remains. The approach changes. The Marie-Antoinettes of the liberal elite realize that the Brexit vote might have been partially instigated by the human flows following Merkel’s decision to open European borders to Syrian refugees. But according to them, the problem isn’t Merkel’s policy, it’s the mediatic impact of the human waves or the migrant boats in the Mediterranean, creating a fear among Europeans that they were being overrun.
The new approach of humanitarian corridors aims to continue the flow; however, it will be meticulously organized, in theory barely noticeable to the view of the public.
Migrants will keep arriving, not on foot or by boat but by plane.
The liberal elite wants to prove it can solve problems without compromising its values.
The plan resembles the one adopted by Merkel with the agreement with ErdoÄŸan. While the human wave stopped, hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees have been flown to Germany since then. Liberal leaders are convinced that immigration is not a problem if managed orderly, and that anxieties of European citizens will go away if the media covers the topic correctly.
Will it work?
We stick to the effectiveness of Merkel’s policy, since it’s the only precedent.
The answer is no. Germany has already found out the hard way that integrating hundreds of thousands of people in such a short time is impossible, economically and socially.
Merkel started early this year the ‘’Joint Way Forward’’ scheme to return Afghan refugees to their home country, but even returns have turned out to be problematic, with pilots refusing to fly over safety concerns.
Nonetheless, the economic costs keep rising and the German government is looking for ways to send Syrians back to their homes as well, much to the consternation of open borders advocates.
Politically, the refugee policy has killed Merkel’s credibility for a relevant part of her former electorate.
She had run and won her previous mandate under the simple message that voters knew her and what they could expect from her, but it didn’t turn out that way.
After this year’s election, Merkel is currently unable to form a government after losing a significant number of votes to the anti-immigration AfD. The ‘’Jamaica coalition’’ idea with the FDP and the Greens failed.
Negotiations with the SDP are stalling. New elections would force her to relinquish power; the liberal elite had chosen her as the new ‘’leader of the free world’’, a nominal role uniquely attributed to US Presidents in the past, out of rejection of Donald Trump, but it looks like they are going to need a new one as well. Predictably, it’ll be Macron and he’s already well on his path to repeat the same mistakes.
Merkel’s attempt to quell dissent by enacting a number of censorship laws on social media has not worked either.
The problem isn’t the media, nor the allegedly unjustified criticism by Europeans; the problem is her policy.
An alternative path
Avramopoulous has presented his opinion that migration flows can’t be stopped as an absolute truth.
Yet, when one of the most committed countries to open borders, Sweden, found out that the flow was not compatible with its integrating capabilities, ranging from housing, to education, to social stability, it did reinstate controls to the border with Denmark to limit any further influx from the Third World, with the minister of a left-green coalition government announcing the measure in tears. More recently, the Swedish Finance Minister admitted that ‘’integration isn’t working’’and immigration costs for Sweden are unsustainable.
Avramopoulos’s truth might as well be a lie, as we are shifting in the Orwellian phase of liberalism, where every word means the exact opposite.
The flows envisaged by the EU chief have already proved to be unsustainable; if he doesn’t have the will or the power to stop them, someone else will do it, without the need to give up on humanitarian assistance.
Can humanitarian assistance coexist with the necessity to curb migration flows to Europe?
Instead of funding UN/UNHCR/IOM schemes to fly refugees to Europe, an alternative could be to create protection centers in stable countries neighbouring conflict areas.
If there’s a conflict in Eritrea, then the EU, European countries and the rest of international institutions could offer additional aid to the neighbouring Ethiopia in exchange for setting up centers for refugees and offer protection locally. If the crisis is in Sudan, then centers could be set up in the Central African Republic, or Chad, or Kenya, or the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Localized humanitarian protection has various advantages over the human corridor approach; while both allow the EU to save its face on humanitarian matters:
- Individuals needing protection will actually be closer to the place that can protect them, without needing to travel to Libya or other North African shores.
- It’s financially sounder; according to Oxford professor Paul Collier, it’s 135 times cheaper to protect refugees locally, rather than bringing them to Europe, due to the cheaper currencies and standard of living of developing countries.
- The cheaper costs would allow taking care of bigger numbers.
- Once the emergency is finished, it’ll be easier to return to their home countries.
- Family reunions would be easier as well.
- Finally, it’d prove to Europeans that leaders listen to them and reconcile the masses and the elites by providing a solution on an extremely divisive issue.
Egilsstaðir, 11.07.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 16:42 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Margir eru að velta vöngum, um heims viðskiptaheiminn.
Þetta er ekki eins flókið og við erum oft að mikla fyrir okkur.
Bandaríkjamenn, hafa 500 miljarða viðskipta halla við aðrar þjóðir.
Gott er að vita að Bandaríkjamenn hafa viðskipta ágóða við aðrar þjóðir, í þjónustu viðskiptum.
Einhvers staðar sá ég að Trump setti upp ítrustu kröfur, en væri svo tilbúinn í að slá af kröfunum.
Nú, þegar við erum farnir að skilja betur, að peningur er aðeins bókhald, og að ekki er gott að láta stórkapítalið yfirtaka auðlindir og innviði þjóðfélagana, er von til að þjóðirnar geri betri samninga hver við aðrs.
Það er engin ástæða til að borga margfalt verð, á auðlindum, orkunni, vatninu, húsnæðinu, og öðrum þörfum þjóðfélagsins.
Við köfum heldur betur grætt á því að eiga raforkuverin og hitaveiturnar.
Ekki gleyma því, þegar hluti Hitaveitu Suðurnesja, og þá Bláalónið, íslensku fisksölufyrirtækin, Grímsstaðir og fullt af jörðum og fasteignum var selt.
Lesa vel:
slóð
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalbanking208.htm
Slóð
Slóð
Allar vitibornar viðskipta þjóðir, reyna að skrá gengi gjaldmiðillins þannig, að afgangur verði af viðskiptum við útlönd.
Þegar í ljós kemur að einhver þjóð hefur viðskiptahalla við aðra þjóð, eða þjóðir, verður fljótlega að breyta kaupgetu þjóðarinnar, lækka gengið, svo að landsmenn kaupi minna af innfluttum vörum.
Þeir sem eru í EBE, Evru klúbbnum, geta ekki lækkað gengið.
Einnig þarf að gera þjóðunum ljóst, að ef einhver þjóð á að kaupa vörur af öðrum þjóðum, þá verða þær að kaupa nokkuð jafn mikið af þeirri þjóð.
000
Í Grikklandi, lánuðu Evrópu, Þýsku bankarnir til einkabanka, og vissu lítið hvað þeir voru að gera.
Þeir lánuðu, erlendum auðhringum, sjálfum sér, og skipulögðu fjármálakerfi Grikklands.
Síðan var skuldunum klínt á fólkið í Grikklandi og nú er u þar mikil vandræði.
Nokkrir á Íslandi fóru að verjast árás fjármagnsins á Ísland 2008, og komum við aðeins betur út.
Fólkið verður að læra á fjármála spilamennskuna, til að það geti stutt við stjórnmálamenn, þegar þeir vilja lagfæra svindl fjármála kerfisins.
Slóð
9.8.2015 | 23:53
Blankfein and his Goldman team helped Greece hide the true extent of its debt, and in the process almost doubled it. By 2005, Greece owed almost double what it had put into the deal, pushing its off-the-books debt from 2.8 billion euros to 5.1 billion. *
Slóð
18.3.2012 | 17:55
Slóð
Greece is for sale - Stormfront
Slóð
26.8.2016 | 23:18
Í „hverju skrefi“ í skipulagningu á fjármálum Grikklands, sópuðu heims fjármála bankarnir að sér fjármunum og fyrirtækjum Grikklands.
000
*
How Goldman Sachs Profited From The Greek Crisis
By Robert Reich of RobertReich.org
Friday, July 17, 2015 3:02 PM EDT
The Greek debt crisis offers another illustration of Wall Street’s powers of persuasion and predation, although the Street is missing from most accounts.
The crisis was exacerbated years ago by a deal with Goldman Sachs, engineered by Goldman’s current CEO, Lloyd Blankfein.
Blankfein and his Goldman team helped Greece hide the true extent of its debt, and in the process almost doubled it. And just as with the American subprime crisis, and the current plight of many American cities, Wall Street’s predatory lending played an important although little-recognized role.
In 2001, Greece was looking for ways to disguise its mounting financial troubles. The Maastricht Treaty required all eurozone member states to show improvement in their public finances, but Greece was heading in the wrong direction.
Then Goldman Sachs came to the rescue, arranging a secret loan of 2.8 billion euros for Greece, disguised as an off-the-books “cross-currency swap”—a complicated transaction in which Greece’s foreign-currency debt was converted into a domestic-currency obligation using a fictitious market exchange rate.
As a result, about 2 percent of Greece’s debt magically disappeared from its national accounts. Christoforos Sardelis, then head of Greece’s Public Debt Management Agency, later described the deal to Bloomberg Business as “a very sexy story between two sinners.”
For its services, Goldman received a whopping 600 million euros ($793 million), according to Spyros Papanicolaou, who took over from Sardelis in 2005. That came to about 12 percent of Goldman’s revenue from its giant trading and principal-investments unit in 2001—which posted record sales that year. The unit was run by Blankfein.
Then the deal turned sour. After the 9/11 attacks, bond yields plunged, resulting in a big loss for Greece because of the formula Goldman had used to compute the country’s debt repayments under the swap. By 2005, Greece owed almost double what it had put into the deal, pushing its off-the-books debt from 2.8 billion euros to 5.1 billion.
In 2005, the deal was restructured and that 5.1 billion euros in debt locked in. Perhaps not incidentally, Mario Draghi, now head of the European Central Bank and a major player in the current Greek drama, was then managing director of Goldman’s international division.
Greece wasn’t the only sinner. Until 2008, European Union accounting rules allowed member nations to manage their debt with so-called off-market rates in swaps, pushed by Goldman and other Wall Street banks. In the late 1990s, JPMorgan enabled Italy to hide its debt by swapping currency at a favorable exchange rate, thereby committing Italy to future payments that didn’t appear on its national accounts as future liabilities.
But Greece was in the worst shape, and Goldman was the biggest enabler. Undoubtedly, Greece suffers from years of corruption and tax avoidance by its wealthy. But Goldman wasn’t an innocent bystander: It padded its profits by leveraging Greece to the hilt—along with much of the rest of the global economy. Other Wall Street banks did the same. When the bubble burst, all that leveraging pulled the world economy to its knees.
Even with the global economy reeling from Wall Street’s excesses, Goldman offered Greece another gimmick. In early November 2009, three months before the country’s debt crisis became global news, a Goldman team proposed a financial instrument that would push the debt from Greece’s healthcare system far into the future. This time, though, Greece didn’t bite.
As we know, Wall Street got bailed out by American taxpayers. And in subsequent years, the banks became profitable again and repaid their bailout loans. Bank shares have gone through the roof. Goldman’s were trading at $53 a share in November 2008; they’re now worth over $200. Executives at Goldman and other Wall Street banks have enjoyed huge pay packages and promotions. Blankfein, now Goldman’s CEO, raked in $24 million last year alone.
Meanwhile, the people of Greece struggle to buy medicine and food.
There are analogies here in America, beginning with the predatory loans made by Goldman, other big banks, and the financial companies they were allied with in the years leading up to the bust. Today, even as the bankers vacation in the Hamptons, millions of Americans continue to struggle with the aftershock of the financial crisis in terms of lost jobs, savings, and homes.
Meanwhile, cities and states across America have been forced to cut essential services because they’re trapped in similar deals sold to them by Wall Street banks. Many of these deals have involved swaps analogous to the ones Goldman sold the Greek government.
And much like the assurances it made to the Greek government, Goldman and other banks assured the municipalities that the swaps would let them borrow more cheaply than if they relied on traditional fixed-rate bonds—while downplaying the risks they faced. Then, as interest rates plunged and the swaps turned out to cost far more, Goldman and the other banks refused to let the municipalities refinance without paying hefty fees to terminate the deals.
Three years ago, the Detroit Water Department had to pay Goldman and other banks penalties totaling $547 million to terminate costly interest-rate swaps. Forty percent of Detroit’s water bills still go to paying off the penalty. Residents of Detroit whose water has been shut off because they can’t pay have no idea that Goldman and other big banks are responsible.
Likewise, the Chicago school system—whose budget is already cut to the bone—must pay over $200 million in termination penalties on a Wall Street deal that had Chicago schools paying $36 million a year in interest-rate swaps.
A deal involving interest-rate swaps that Goldman struck with Oakland, California, more than a decade ago has ended up costing the city about $4 million a year, but Goldman has refused to allow Oakland out of the contract unless it ponies up a $16 million termination fee—prompting the city council to pass a resolution to boycott Goldman. When confronted at a shareholder meeting about it, Blankfein explained that it was against shareholder interests to tear up a valid contract.
Goldman Sachs and the other giant Wall Street banks are masterful at selling complex deals by exaggerating their benefits and minimizing their costs and risks. That’s how they earn giant fees. When a client gets into trouble—whether that client is an American homeowner, a US city, or Greece—Goldman ducks and hides behind legal formalities and shareholder interests.
Borrowers that get into trouble are rarely blameless, of course: They spent too much, and were gullible or stupid enough to buy Goldman’s pitches. Greece brought on its own problems, as did many American homeowners and municipalities.
But in all of these cases, Goldman knew very well what it was doing. It knew more about the real risks and costs of the deals it proposed than those who accepted them. “It is an issue of morality,” said the shareholder at the Goldman meeting where Oakland came up. Exactly.
Egilsstaðir, 05.07.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
|
Viðskiptastríð tveggja stærstu hagkerfa heims |
| Tilkynna um óviðeigandi tengingu við frétt | |
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 22:41 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
That’s fighting words for the Deep State and its mainstream media arm, for which demonizing Russia and its president Vladimir Putin is an obsession.
The fact that Donald Trump made his intention to get along with Moscow a priority during his 2016 campaign, both against his Republican primary rivals and Hillary Clinton (who has compared Putin to Hitler) was cause for alarm. This is because far more than even the frightening prospect that the 70-year state of war on the Korean Peninsula might end, US reconciliation with Russia would yank the rug out from under the phony justifications for spending hundreds of billions of dollars annually to counter a “threat” that ceased to exist over a quarter century ago. Absent hostility to Russia that money has no reason to keep sustaining the power, privilege, and prosperity of a horde of moochers and profiteers, both at home and abroad.
That’s why when it was reported soon after his January 2017 inauguration that Trump was seeking to open dialogue with the Kremlin and set an early summit with Putin there was a hysterical counteraction. As described just over a year ago by conservative columnist and former presidential candidate Patrick Buchanan:
“Trump planned a swift lifting of sanctions on Russia after inauguration and a summit meeting with Vladimir Putin to prevent a second Cold War. The State Department was tasked with working out the details. Instead, says Daniel Fried, the coordinator for sanctions policy, he received ‘panicky’ calls of ‘Please, my God, can you stop this?’. Operatives at State, disloyal to the president and hostile to the Russia policy on which he had been elected, collaborated with elements in Congress to sabotage any detente. They succeeded. “It would have been a win-win for Moscow,” said Tom Malinowski of State, who boasted last week of his role in blocking a rapprochement with Russia. State employees sabotaged one of the principal policies for which Americans had voted, and they substituted their own.
Back then, constitutional government and the rule of law took a back seat to bureaucratic obstructionism, atop months of a phony “Russian collusion” story that even anti-Russian Republican Congressmen are now calling to “finish the hell up.” But now, in the aftermath of the successful Singapore summit and with the collusion narrative looking ever more threadbare, Trump is back on track. The summit with Putin will finally take place on July 16 in Helsinki, Finland, the site of earlier meetings between American and Russian leaders.
Today the assaults on Trump are no less frenzied than a year ago, but they seem to pack less of a punch with the critics’ glum awareness that, aside from some extraordinary provocation, little can be done to stop the summit from taking place. The Beltway Swamp’s flagship bulletin board Washington Post accused Trump of “kowtowing” to Putin by merely agreeing to meet with him. Trump’s one-on-one with the “autocrat” Putin will be a “meeting of kindred spirits,” warned the conceited New York Times. Putin has “devoured” Trump grumbled über-Russophobe Ralph Peters on CNN. Trump wants to “Finlandize” the US moaned Max Boot. Officials in the United Kingdom, a key culprit in ginning up “Russiagate” in the first place, are particularly scared that – horror! – there could be a “peace deal” between Trump and Putin.
Major worries are voiced by useless freeloader countries we call“allies,” whose governments fret that the US will become “less reliable” – to their rulers’ interests of course, not to those of the American people. This specifically means the members of NATO, whose summit Trump will attend prior to Helsinki. As former US ambassador to Moscow and to NATO Alexander Vershbow suggests, “allies are wondering whether they will be in for nothing more than a tongue lashing by President Trump over insufficient defense spending, further inflaming transatlantic divisions over trade, the Iran deal, and other issues.”
Indeed, Trump’s hammering on the NATO deadbeats’ treating the US as a “piggy bank” that will no longer be at their disposal exposes the biggest fraud at the heart of the long-obsolete alliance: there is no threat of Russian military “aggression” and they all know it. If these countries really thought they were in danger of invasion from Russia (and not from Third World migrants, regarding which NATO is totally worthless) they wouldn’t need Trump to nag them about spending, they’d commit more money because they knew they had to. The proof is in noting which NATO member, after the US, consistently spends the largest GDP share on its military: Greece. Is that because the penniless Greeks are terrified of Russia? No, they’re afraid of a genuine threat from their fellow NATO “ally,”Turkey.
In the absence of an actual military menace from the east, NATO advocates are scrambling to come up with ever more imaginative justifications. As described by one member of Latvia’s parliament on the website of the Atlantic Council, a leading Washington establishment think tank, the real Russian threat comes from “hybrid warfare, with an increased focus on asymmetric and nontraditional military capabilities, has made it considerably more difficult for NATO to counter destabilization efforts, information operations, cyber-attacks, disinformation, propaganda, and psychological operations.” Yeah sure, maybe Trump will fall for that! Anything to save the Atlantic Council’s $30 million budget provided by a Who’s Who of US government agencies, NATO and Gulf Arab governments, and military contractor firms.
However, it should not be thought that the US and NATO establishment’s hostility to Russia is entirely venal. There is also a strong ideological component. Whereas during the first Cold War much of the western establishment, especially on the Left, felt an affinity for the materialist goals of communism (if not its methods), Russia’s reemergence under Putin as a conservative country in which national traditions and the Orthodox Church are respected has led to a bitter sense of betrayal. That makes Putin, as articulated by Hillary Clinton, leader of the worldwide “authoritarian, white-supremacist, and xenophobic movement” who is “emboldening right-wing nationalists, separatists, racists, and even neo-Nazis.” No Soviet leader, not even Joseph Stalin, was ever portrayed in such diabolical fashion in US media and government circles the way Putin is.
It is no coincidence that Trump himself is vilified in the same dire Hitlerian terms once reserved for foreign targets of regime change like Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Gaddafi. Together with the rising elements of anti-establishmentism in Europe, most recently in the installation of a patriotic Lega/Five-Star government in Rome, the post-modern, neo-liberal elite on both sides of the Atlantic feels its dominance slipping away.
For some Democratic partisans and Never-Trump neo-conservative Republicans, horror at improved US-Russia relations competes with the loathing of Trump personally. But for other Americans, both supporters of the President and people who find him objectionable, the summit should not be seen as a litmus test about their attitudes toward the current occupant of the White House. Rather, the issue is what the summit can mean for Americans’ safety and security – and perhaps our very survival.
Claims of Russian collusion and attitudes toward Trump have obscured the fact that Russia is the only country on the planet with a nuclear establishment on a par with ours. Even during the worst periods of the first Cold War with the USSR, US administrations of both parties kept in mind that a minimum of mutual respect and open communication was not just prudent, it was literally a matter of life and death – for the American people and for the world.
During the past few years as we have entered what has been called a second Cold War, this time with post-communist Russia, the seriousness with which the US used to regard the old Soviet Union has been lacking. The bipartisan foreign policy consensus became a closed, incestuous loop in which Republicans and Democrats vied for who could be most strident in their anti-Russian attitudes: let’s poke the bear and see if he growls!
NATO expansion right in Russia’s face became an end in itself, continuing with induction of Montenegro in 2017, plans to welcome Macedonia (or “North Macedonia” or whatever other silly name is concocted to appease Hellenic pride) – even Ukraine, Georgia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina remain formally on track for joining.
READ MORE: Putin-Trump meeting set for July 16 in Helsinki, Kremlin confirms
Color revolutions and disastrous wars of regime change toppled Moscow-friendly governments, justified as supposed “democracy promotion.” Risk of confrontation between US and Russian military personnel – studiously avoided during Cold War 1 – takes place with reckless glee in Russia’s Black and Baltic Seas littorals, in Ukraine, and especially in Syria, where earlier this year American forces reportedly slaughtered many Russian contractors – to the delight of some of those now warning darkly against the Trump-Putin meeting. Perhaps most dangerously, the painfully constructed complex of arms control agreements has atrophied as both sides build up stocks of new hypersonic, cyber, and space weapons.
It is perhaps beyond the power of either Trump or Putin to reverse this dangerous trend with one stroke, but maybe they can at least make a start in arresting it. The usual suspects warn of failure, but their real worry is that the summit might be a success. Let’s hope their worst nightmare comes true and peace breaks out.
Jim Jatras, former US diplomat
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
Egilsstaðir, 07.07.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 20:58 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Við sem höfum villst af leið, verðum að snúa til betri vegar, áður en fimmta skilningarvitið, verður almennings eign. Við viljum ekki sofna, verða að steini, vegna rangrar kennslu síðustu þúsund árin. Við förum að hlusta á SJÁENDURNA
Hvað er hér á ferðinni? Höfum við villst af leið? Þurfum við að flýta okkur að leita að réttu götunni? Háskóla eðlisfræðingarnir, í orkuflæðinu, kenna 10 + víddir, en grunnskólarnir og menntaskólarnir, kenna þrjár víddir og tíma. Þá skiljum við almenningur ekki neitt.
Hvers vegna á að senda okkur út í heiminn, trúandi á efnisheim, sem er blekking, sýndar heimur? Þetta hefur verið vitað svo langt aftur sem sögur ná. Má þar nefna kennsluna sem trúarbrögðin, Hindúatrú, Búddatrú, Íslam, Gyðingatrú og Kristni, kenndu okkur.
Nútíma háskólar, eru komnir að sömu niðurstöðu, að allt sé orka, og myndin birtist okkur í geislunum, geislaskjánum, sem Nikola Tesla sagði okkur frá, og sem við lifum í.
Líklega er atómið myndpunkturinn í geisla myndskjánum.
000
Who is God? Nikola Tesla explains.
Nikola Tesla íslenska / english
https://jonasg-egi.blog.is/blog/jonasg-egi/entry/2208376/
https://jonasg-egi.blog.is/blog/jonasg-egi/entry/2207031/
000
The World Bank-IMF is owned and controlled by Nathan Mayer Rothschild and 30 to 40 of the wealthiest people in the world. For over 150 years they have planned to take the world over through money.
The former chief economist of the World Bank, Joe Stiglitz, was fired recently.
He pointed out to top executives that every country the IMF/World Bank got involved in ended up with,
Jim Wolfensen, the president of the World Bank would not comment on his dismissal. Before Joe Stiglitz was fired he took a large stack of secret documents out of the World Bank.
These secret documents from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund reveal the 4 steps that the IMF required from nations:
If they do not agree to these steps they are cut-off from all international borrowing.
Today if can't borrow money in the international marketplace, no one can survive, whether you are people or corporations or countries. If that does not work they overthrow the government and plant lies about the former government and/or even rewrite history.
This is signed by Jim Wolfensen, the president of the World Bank. Argentina has had six presidents in five weeks because their economy is completely destroyed. This happened because they started out in the end of the 80s with orders from the IMF and World Bank to sell-off all their assets, public assets, like their water system. Then they taxed the people.
They created big government and big government handed it off to the private IMF/World Bank.
They pay off the politicians billions in Swiss bank accounts.
A pipeline was sold off, that runs between Argentina and Chile, was sold off to a company called Enron. Then the globalists blow out Enron after transferring the assets to another dummy corporation.
The Globalists pay them off individually, billions a piece in Swiss bank accounts. The plan is total slavery for the entire population.
Enron is a dummy corporation for money laundering, drug money, etc.
It's not privatization. They steal it from the people and hand it over to the IMF/World Bank.
They hand it over, generally to the cronies, like,
The problem is that they are destroying these systems as well.
You can't even get drinking water in Buenos Aires. It is not just a question of the theft. You can't turn on the tap. It is more than someone getting rich at the public expense. And the IMF just got handed the Great Lakes. They have the sole control over the water supply now.
The IMF and the World Bank is 51% owned by the United States Treasury.
Indonesia is in flames. Every country IMF/World Bank meddling in they destroyed their economy and they ended up in flames. They even plan in the riots. They know that when they squeeze a country and destroy its economy, you get riots in the streets. And they admit that it an IMF riot.
Because you have riot, all the capital runs away from your country and that gives the opportunity for the IMF to then add more conditions.
They are getting so greedy - they are preparing it for America. The chief investigators of Enron for the State of California said that that it's not just the stockholders that got ripped off. They sucked millions, billions of dollars out of the public pocket in Texas and California in particular.
Where are the assets? See, everybody says there are no assets left since Enron was a dummy corporation - from the experts I've had on and they transferred all those assets to other corporations and banks.
You did pay California's electric bills according to the investigations, they are telling me that they were pumped up unnecessarily by 9 to 12-billion dollars. And I don't know who they are going to get it back from now.
Well they actually caught the Governor buying it for $137 per megawatt and selling it back to Enron for $1 per megawatt and doing it over and over and over again.
Lord Wakeham, who was on the audit committee of Enron, is the head of NM Rothschild. There isn't anything that he doesn't have his fingers in. He's on something like fifty Boards. And he was supposed to be head of the audit committee watching how Enron kept the books.
In fact, they were paying him consulting fees on the side. He was in Margaret Thatcher's government and he's the one who authorized Enron to come into Britain and take over power plants in Britain. Enron owned a water system in the middle of England.
This is what Lord Wakeham approved and then they gave him a job on the board. On top of being on the board, they gave him a huge consulting contract. Lord Wakeham is supposed to be in charge of the audit committee to see how they were handling their accounts, but he is also the head of the board to regulate the media.
Lord Wakeham is trying to pass laws in England where you can't own your own water. He can't be touched because he regulates the media.
The IMF/World Bank implosion, four points, how they bring down a country and destroy the resources of the people.
Its like the opium wars.
This isn't free trade; this is coercion trade. This is war. They are taking apart economies through this. China has a 40% tariff on the USA, but the USA has a 2% on them. That's not free and fair trade.
It's to force all industry into a country that the globalists fully control, and they control China.
There is almost nothing in a Walmart store that comes from the United States of America, despite all the eagles on the wall. They have big flags saying "Buy American" and there's hardly anything from America in their stores.
What's even worst is they will hire a factory and right next to it will be the sister factory which is inside a prison.
You can imagine the conditions of these workers producing this lovely stuff for Walmart.
A Senator from Argentina said that he got a call from George W. Bush in 1988 saying give the gas pipeline in Argentina to Enron. Enron was going to pay one-fifth of the world's price for their gas and he said how can you make such an offer?
The answer was that if they only pay one-fifth that leaves quit a little bit for you to go in your Swiss bank account. This is the same George W. Bush who said he didn't get to know Ken Lay of Enron until 1994. Now they are having these white-wash hearings.
Bill Clinton, to get even with Bush's big donor, cut Enron out of the California power market. He put a cap on the prices they could charge. They couldn't charge more than one-hundred times the normal price for electricity. That upset Enron. So Ken Lay personally wrote a note to Dick Cheney saying get rid of Clinton's cap on prices.
Within 48 hours of George W. Bush taking office, his energy department reversed the clamps on Enron.
A fifth of the population of Argentina (2002?) is unemployed, and they said cut the unemployment benefits drastically, take away pension funds, cut the education budgets. Now if you cut the economy in the middle of a recession (created by the IMF), you absolutely demolish the nation.
But they tell these countries you've got to cut, and cut, and cut. And why, according to the inside documents, it's so you can make payments to foreign banks - the foreign banks are collecting 21% to 70% interest. This is loan-sharking.
If fact, it was so bad that they required Argentina to get rid of the laws against loan-sharking because any bank would be a loan-shark under Argentine law.
They destroy an economy so that it can not produce anything, and then open the borders to sell their own goods. They force nations to pay horrendous amounts for things like drugs - legal drugs. That's how you end up with an illegal drug trade.
What's there left to survive on except sell us smack and crack. And so, drive the whole world down, blow out their economies and then buy the rest of it up for pennies on the dollar.
What's Step 4 of the IMF/World Bank Plan? In Step 4, they take apart of the government by the coup d'état and they install their own corporate government.
In Venezuela where they have an elected president of the government, the IMF has announced that they would support a transition government if the president was removed.
They are not saying that they are going to get involved in politics - they would just support a transition government. What that effectively is saying, we will pay for the coup d'état, if the military overthrows the current president, because the current president of Venezuela has said NO to the IMF.
He told those guys to go packing. They brought their teams in and said you have to do this and that. And he said, I don't have to do anything. He said what I'm going to do is double the taxes on oil corporations because we have a whole lot of oil in Venezuela. And I'm going to double the taxes on oil corporations and then I will have all the money I need for social programs and the government - and we will be a very rich nation.
Well, as soon as he did that, they started fomenting trouble with the military and watch this because the President of Venezuela will be out of office in three months or shot dead.
They are not going to allow him to raise taxes (2002) on the oil companies...
This was like a scene out of Le Carre.
The brilliant old agent comes in from the cold, crosses to our side, and in hours of debriefing, empties his memory of horrors committed in the name of a political ideology he now realizes has gone rotten.
But instead of chairing the meetings of ministers and central bankers, Stiglitz was kept exiled safely behind the blue police cordons, the same as the nuns carrying a large wooden cross, the Bolivian union leaders, the parents of AIDS victims and the other 'anti-globalization' protesters. The ultimate insider was now on the outside.
He was not allowed quiet retirement; US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, I'm told, demanded a public excommunication for Stiglitz' having expressed his first mild dissent from globalization World Bank style.
Stiglitz helped translate one from bureaucratise, a "Country Assistance Strategy."
There's an Assistance Strategy for every poorer nation, designed, says the World Bank, after careful in-country investigation. But according to insider Stiglitz, the Bank's staff 'investigation' consists of close inspection of a nation's 5-star hotels. It concludes with the Bank staff meeting some begging, busted finance minister who is handed a 'restructuring agreement' pre-drafted for his 'voluntary' signature (I have a selection of these).
By the way, don't be confused by the mix in this discussion of the IMF, World Bank and WTO.
They are interchangeable masks of a single governance system. They have locked themselves together by what are unpleasantly called, "triggers." Taking a World Bank loan for a school 'triggers' a requirement to accept every 'conditionality' - they average 111 per nation - laid down by both the World Bank and IMF.
In fact, said Stiglitz the IMF requires nations to accept trade policies more punitive than the official WTO rules.
Their trick?
So then I turned on Stiglitz. OK, Mr Smart-Guy Professor, how would you help developing nations?
Stiglitz proposed radical land reform, an attack at the heart of "landlordism," on the usurious rents charged by the propertied oligarchies worldwide, typically 50% of a tenant's crops.
So I had to ask the professor: as you were top economist at the World Bank, why didn't the Bank follow your advice?
Apparently not.
Every time their free market solutions failed, the IMF simply demanded more free market policies.
I took away from my talks with the professor that the solution to world poverty and crisis is simple: remove the bloodsuckers.
Big Issue offered equal space to the IMF, whose "deputy chief media officer" wrote:
Of course it was difficult for the Deputy Chief to respond. The information (and documents) came from the unhappy lot inside his agency and the World Bank.
|
Niðurstöður fyrir geisla
6 bloggfærslur fundust
slóðir
Hvað er hér á ferðinni? Höfum við villst af leið? Þurfum við að flýta okkur að leita að réttu götunni? Háskóla eðlisfræðingarnir, í orkuflæðinu, kenna 10 + víddir, en grunnskólarnir og menntaskólarnir, kenna þrjár víddir og tíma. Við erum skilningslausir.
Við sem höfum villst af leið, verðum að snúa til betri vegar, áður en fimmta skilningarvitið, verður almennings eign. Við viljum ekki sofna, verða að steini, vegna rangrar kennslu síðustu þúsund árin. Við förum að hlusta á SJÁENDURNA Hvað er hér á
Fá stjarneðlisfræðinga, kjarnaeðlisfræðinga, efniseðlisfræðinga, víddaeðlisfræðinga, það er þá sem hafa lært um hvernig heimurinn, veröldin er upp byggð. Þessa sem lærðu um strengja fræðina, fjölheima, það er the string theory, og multi verse.
Sett á blogg: Óli Jón ... og enn gefur hún eftir https://olijon.blog.is/blog/olijon/entry/2216866/ Það er betra að hugsa tvisvar, þrisvar. „ En nú þykir mér það ráð, að vér látim og eigi þá ráða, er mest vilja í gegn gangast, og miðlum svo mál á
Þeir sem leituðu nýrra lausna, sköpuðu nútíma heiminn. Ef við leitum ekki að nýjum lausnum, þá finnum við þær ekki. Nú förum við á fulla ferð í leita að og skapa betri heim með ljósinu og litunum, og munum að nóg er til.
Við verðum að taka vel eftir því, hvaða greinar eru valdar í blöðin. Eigandi fjölmiðla, ræður starfskraft til að starfa hjá sér. Ef starfskrafturinn velur oftast umsögn frá aðila sem túlkar einn ákveðin hugmyndaheim, þá er hann að hygla því sjónarmiði.
Til - Hannesar H Gissurarsonar, þú segir satt. - Yfir aldirnar, hafa lærdómssetrim kennt hin ýmsu fræði, og meðal annars að það sé engin Guð. Nú erum við farnir að skynja, að efnið er aðeins orkuform, sýndarheimur í orkunni.
31.3.2018 | 09:37 Hvað segi ég í Las Vegas? Segir, Hannes Hólmsteinn Gissurarson. Þú segir þeim í Las Vegas frá því að peningar séu bókhald. slóð Coins and bills Þú segir þeim frá því að Nikola Tesla sé spakur. slóð Nikola Tesla var einn af þeim, sem
Stóra málið er að opna fyrir sköpunargáfuna, og leita lausna. Ef við leitum ekki, þá finnum við ekki, og jafnvel þótt við finnum, þá getur nústaðreyndatrúin verið svo sterk að við lokum augunum fyrir því augljósa.
Sett á blogg: Sveinn R. Pálsson Guðspjallið https://svennip.blog.is/blog/svennip/entry/2208579/ Gleðileg jól og nýtt ár. Það er gaman að fylgjast með ykkur. Eingetinn ? það er ekkert mál hafir þú þekkinguna. Guð er andi, var einhvern tíman sagt. Virðist
Við leikum okkur að því að hugsa, er þetta tölvuflaga, og er allt lífið, veröldin einn tölvukubbur? Auðvita er þetta leikrit, þroska leikrit, skapað til að gera okkur kleift að byggja upp veröldina. Við getum ekki byggt upp, meira en við getum hugsað.
Sett á blogg: Einar Björn Bjarnason Eitthvað þótti Trump fara fram úr sér með því að hæla sér af öruggu ári í flugi 2017 https://einarbb.blog.is/blog/einarbb/entry/2208967/ Heill og sæll. Ef til vill hefur Trump, verið með hugann við víðara samhengi.
26.8.2016 | 23:18
...every country the IMF/World Bank got involved in ended up with, 1. a crashed economy 2. a destroyed government 3. sometimes in flames with riots - These secret documents from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund reveal the 4 steps
Egilsstaðir, 06.07.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Bloggar | Breytt 7.7.2018 kl. 07:50 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Sett á blogg. Bjarni Jónsson
https://bjarnijonsson.blog.is/blog/bjarnijonsson/entry/2219005/
4
Fríverzlunarsamningar eru framtíðin, segir þú.
Það sem þú ert að segja virðist stefna í rétta átt.
Tek undir hvert orð.
Egilsstaðir, 04.07.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Jónas Gunnlaugsson, 4.7.2018 kl. 18:24
3
Eitt sinn, hér áður, var fylgi Sjálfstæðisflokksins, komið niður úr öllu valdi, þá hafði flokkurinn farið að láta víxlarana ráða förinni.
Þá skrifaði einhver ágætis maður, grein, eða flutti útvarpserindi, og sagði að ef flokkurinn ætlaði að vera íhaldsflokkur eins og flokkarnir á norðurlöndunum, þá færi fylgið niður í það sama og á norðurlöndunum.
Sjálfsæðisflokkurinn yrði þá smá flokkur.
Í stað þess að landsmenn yrðu sjálfstæðir húseigendur, yrðu þeir leiguliðar, stóreignafélaga.
Flokkurinn þarf að taka þessa umræðu, hvort hann ætlar að vera smáflokkur fjármagnsins, eða stór flokkur allra stétta.
Bið ykkur vel að lifa.
Egilsstaðir, 04.07.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Jónas Gunnlaugsson, 4.7.2018 kl. 18:01
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 00:34 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
With a trade deficit over $500 billion running in their favor, we need to create incentives for our trading partners to renegotiate our current relationships.
That’s because nations – like people – rarely give up economic benefits they’ve grown used to having simply because doing so would be fair. They operate in their self-interest
000
Trump-s trade critics are wrong -- His tariffs could bring major benefits to America
Changing times require changing policies. Just because America’s trade practices made sense decades ago does not mean these same trade practices make sense in the 21st century.
President Trump has since explained what “magic wand” he will use. But it’s not magic at all. It’s smart negotiating. In simplified terms, here’s how it works:
With a trade deficit over $500 billion running in their favor, we need to create incentives for our trading partners to renegotiate our current relationships.
That’s because nations – like people – rarely give up economic benefits they’ve grown used to having simply because doing so would be fair. They operate in their self-interest.
However, given this current trade imbalance, our trading partners have more to lose from reduced trade than we do.
Using the potential of fairer and more balanced – but still lucrative – trade relationships as the carrot and economically punitive tariffs as the stick isn’t a magic wand.
However, it could be a very effective approach in the hands of a skilled negotiator willing to do what it takes to convince our trading partners that we are serious – but open to negotiation.
When considering trade policy, it is important to recognize the difference between using tariffs to tilt the international playing field in favor of American businesses and using them as a negotiating tool.
Egilsstaðir, 04.07.2018 Jónas Gunnlaugsson
Bloggar | Breytt s.d. kl. 10:13 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
Höfundur
Velt vöngum, Ef eitthvað er hér sem er til upplýsingar, og til góðs, þá er um að gera að dreifa því sem víðast. Við verðum að læra um fjármálin og breyta svo fjármálakerfinu.
http://jonasg-eg.blog.is/blog/jonasg-eg/about/
hitt bloggið hér neðan við, bloggin eru tvö
the other blog is here
http://www.ismennt.is/not/jonasg/jg/jg06/
http://jonasg-eg.blog.is/blog/jonasg-eg/
RSSNýjustu færslur
- Hér er hægt að fá að vita heilmikið um það ""hvað varð um pen...
- Ísrael samþykkir sölu á fyrsta frumu ræktaða nautakjöti heims...
- Money as Debt - The animated feature Money as Debt by Canadia...
- Gleðileg Jól og nýtt ár Jónas og Margrét. Egilsstaðir
- Nýtt heimili jólasveinsins: Norðurpólinn er að flytja til Rús...
- Adam Smith enn í fullu fjöri! Hannes Hólmsteinn Gissurarson ...
- History of the Jews - Summary on a Map
- Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn hefur alltaf misst fylgið þegar fjármál...
- Hve margar eru eignirnar á árihjá umsýslu mönnum? Þeir tóku h...
- Allir fái 57 milljónir fyrir 3 Milljónir. Við eigum íbúðina þ...
- Raunveruleg ástæða aukinnar verðbólgu hefur loksins verið við...
- Alþingi lét LÖGIN og þá RÍKIÐ og þá framkvæmda valdið, umsýsl...
- Einkabanki á aldrei að komast upp með að þykjast eiga húsið. ...
- Óútskýrt frávik sem veikir segulsvið jarðar er að þróast og ...
- Árið 2021. Hér er rauða línan byggingakostnaður og bláa línan...
Bloggvinir
agny
Heimsóknir
Flettingar
- Í dag (26.4.): 0
- Sl. sólarhring: 1
- Sl. viku: 9
- Frá upphafi: 0
Annað
- Innlit í dag: 0
- Innlit sl. viku: 9
- Gestir í dag: 0
- IP-tölur í dag: 0
Uppfært á 3 mín. fresti.
Skýringar
